To be an effective leader, a public official must maintain the highest ethical and moral standards.
Leadership has been a source of collective change in society for many decades. Often times, these leaders have had diverse and often times catostrophic consequences for their fellow man. Scientists have long evaluated the qualities that comprise a leader who will benefit the wider society, respect, tolerance and moral judgement are all considerations in the ambiguity of leadership selection. However, I contest that moral judgement is in most instances, a more beneficial trait that fosterng respect from their peers.
Sound moral judgment has been a foundational quality in the more collective advancements of society throughout recent history. Indeed, many of societies largest social advancements - when considering equality- have been spearheaded by leaders with an exceptional moral compass. Mahatami Ghandi, Rosa Parks, Martin Luther King were all leaders with an exceptionall sound moral judgement's who raged against the opressive norms of their respective societies in direct contradicition to the views of their peers. If these educated and insightful individuals had paid close attention to maintaining the respect of their peers, perhaps we would not have seen such steadfast views. Indeed, the very idea of a moral compass is predicated on understanding the contentious realm of prevailing social norms, and choosing to to take the morally correct path irregardless of social consequences from one's peers.
A leader's role is to lead, and therefore, often places him/her in a position of heirarchical advantage. Specifcally, leaders must often make the correct choice irregardless of their peer relationships. If one overly values the consideration of their peers, one places themselves in an untenable position with those which they lead. Their foundational task has become marred by the formalities of social relationships and recripocity to maintain peer respect in lieue of potential progression.
Take the example of the most archetypal leader in the world, a politician, if they begin value maintaining the respect of their peers more than their moral judgment, they will soon turn to a system whereby the elites views become more valued than the collective good.
However, this is not too say that maintaining respect is not a part of the leadership role. If one can establish and maintain respect, realtionships become easier, decisions become more collective, and the group benefits. Nonetheless, as one can see from the seminal studies of Tajfel and Turner, focusing too inwardly on one's own group is instrumental in creating conflict.
With this consideration in mind, the ability to foster and maintain respect is valuable in so far that it assists with maintaining relationships if they serve the wider purpose, but should rarely, if ever, supersede one's sound moral judgment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 144, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'societies the largest'.
Suggestion: societies the largest
...oughout recent history. Indeed, many of societies largest social advancements - when considering ...
Line 3, column 812, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
...f prevailing social norms, and choosing to to take the morally correct path irregardl...
Line 3, column 889, Rule ID: ONES
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
...rregardless of social consequences from ones peers. A leaders role is to lead, a...
Line 5, column 3, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'leaders'' or 'leader's'?
Suggestion: leaders'; leader's
...ial consequences from ones peers. A leaders role is to lead, and therefore, often p...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, nonetheless, so, therefore
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.6327345309 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.9520958084 54% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 11.1786427146 98% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 13.6137724551 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 28.8173652695 104% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 55.5748502994 97% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 16.3942115768 79% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2386.0 2260.96107784 106% => OK
No of words: 432.0 441.139720559 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52314814815 5.12650576532 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55901411391 4.56307096286 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05745412898 2.78398813304 110% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 204.123752495 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530092592593 0.468620217663 113% => OK
syllable_count: 727.2 705.55239521 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.96107784431 101% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.76447105788 57% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.70958083832 221% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.67365269461 239% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.22255489022 24% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 19.7664670659 91% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.8473053892 105% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.1314086726 57.8364921388 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.555555556 119.503703932 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 23.324526521 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.44444444444 5.70786347227 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 5.15768463074 116% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.25449101796 76% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.20758483034 122% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 6.88822355289 44% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.67664670659 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.309826844696 0.218282227539 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113265018441 0.0743258471296 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.152706157057 0.0701772020484 218% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158489882206 0.128457276422 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.204878481248 0.0628817314937 326% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
automated_readability_index: 16.6 14.3799401198 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 48.3550499002 80% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.1628742515 156% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.197005988 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.5979740519 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.32208582834 114% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 98.500998004 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 12.3882235529 69% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.1389221557 104% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.9071856287 101% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.