To be an effective leader, a public official must maintain the highest ethical and moral standards.
An effective leader always works for the benefit of society with due consideration to ethics and morality. I, am in accordance with the authors’ view the author view: an official leader should always maintain the utmost ethical and moral standards. A leader with such assets is always admired and looked up as an exemplary figure, a motivation and role model to do something concrete and indelible for the country and fellow natives.
A leader, sat on authoritative position where he/she has to make serious decision regarding imminent issue, issues of national sovereignty, national security, human welfare. No leader with ethics and moral standard would make right decision for the nation if he/she is not empathetic with nation’s interest which is decided by moral and ethics he/she has within. This can be further strengthened by the example of my country, Nepal. In the history of Nepal, Political leaders, kings are rarely esteemed and beloved by our countrymen. At times, they have compromised their ethics and morality: they have signed various onerous treaties with other countries that have always proved deleterious for the nation’s development. In such way, they have been despised owing to their unethical and immoral acts. However, only few leaders in country’s history are lauded by people who always worked for nation’s betterment, who sacrificed their life for saving the national sovereignty and national integrity.
Any country has heterogenous population, a leader can not emphasis only to a faction of population and bias advantages for them. Every individual must be inclusive in the mainstream of development. If a leader is not ethical and with moral standard , he/she would not make decision for all. In such a case, a leader would be denigrated by public. So, a leader to be for all, he/she should be of great ethics and morality to be loved and admired. Such leader is bestowed with public support and whatever decision he makes, is never hindered by public and works can be progressed with efficiency.
Great leaders like Mahatma Gandhi, Abraham Lincoln have always been admired by people for their simplicity, morality and ethics. They always made decision with priority to nation rather than a faction of population and hence were greatly supported by public. Such support has been the factor for their success on achieving their goal efficiently.
To conclude, a ethics and morality are the assets of successful and efficient leaders. With such traits, they have been indelible in world history for generations to applaud them as great leaders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 419, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g concrete and indelible for the country and fellow natives. A leader, sat o...
^^
Line 9, column 249, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...r is not ethical and with moral standard , he/she would not make decision for all....
^^
Line 9, column 353, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...der would be denigrated by public. So, a leader to be for all, he/she should be o...
^^
Line 17, column 14, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...eir goal efficiently. To conclude, a ethics and morality are the assets of s...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, look, regarding, so, then, as to, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2208.0 2235.4752809 99% => OK
No of words: 415.0 442.535393258 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32048192771 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51348521516 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82182359093 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.503614457831 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 693.9 704.065955056 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.6413269579 60.3974514979 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.142857143 118.986275619 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7619047619 23.4991977007 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.90476190476 5.21951772744 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27221799368 0.243740707755 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0925348844335 0.0831039109588 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0830981777896 0.0758088955206 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154656992792 0.150359130593 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10292561469 0.0667264976115 154% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 14.1392134831 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.1639044944 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.38706741573 110% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 100.480337079 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.