The best ideas arise from a passionate interest in commonplace things.
It is said that commonplace things can motivate people to create and discover new ideas. In other words, they are a doorway to new ideas. I agree with this point of view.
I can explain why I believe that the best ideas arise from a passionate interest in commonplace things. we only need to look at the life story of some famous people such as Newton. Did he find out the gravity of earth based on a complicated thing? Absolutely no, he discovered the gravity of earth by falling down an apple from the tree. Is this a complex phenomenon? He could understand this event just because he had more attention to what existed around him. In other words, most of the time the simplest thing can be a source of many complicated new ideas. For example, the flight of a bird which was something that motivated the Wright brothers for the building of an airplane. After that spacecraft was built by NASA. All of these have been created based on a commonplace thing. According to what all people can see and deal with them. Therefore, I believe that it is not necessary to find something complex and unusual to create new ideas.
But this argument is rejected by some people because they believe that individuals can not find something new in banal things. They claim that banality itself prevents people from the creation of innovative ideas. While I believe that they do not know that the knowledge of humanity is not complete, and it is the same as a water drop compared to the sea. How much they sure that they know all things about the flight or the gravity of the earth? Is the flight only restricted to some airplanes or spaceships? Do they sure that they know all the simple and common things around them? We can see that nowadays mathematicians can make some complex algorithms just with the inspiration from the performance of some animals such as honey bee and bat.
To summarize, in my view, I believe that for creation or discovery something new we do not need to find something unique and strange. We only require to pay more attention to our environment and try to create creative and innovative ideas with inspiration from simple and common things.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 105, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: We
...sionate interest in commonplace things. we only need to look at the life story of ...
^^
Line 3, column 684, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...others for the building of an airplane. After that spacecraft was built by NASA. All ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 948, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...omplex and unusual to create new ideas. But this argument is rejected by some pe...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, so, therefore, while, for example, such as, in my view, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 33.0505617978 148% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1780.0 2235.4752809 80% => OK
No of words: 384.0 442.535393258 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.63541666667 5.05705443957 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4267276788 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54021474923 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 215.323595506 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.463541666667 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 557.1 704.065955056 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.1716586417 60.3974514979 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 74.1666666667 118.986275619 62% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0 23.4991977007 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.54166666667 5.21951772744 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159727345546 0.243740707755 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0491263063971 0.0831039109588 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.141983648731 0.0758088955206 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0916154647014 0.150359130593 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0602612034273 0.0667264976115 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.4 14.1392134831 59% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 48.8420337079 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 12.1743820225 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.34 12.1639044944 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.94 8.38706741573 83% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 100.480337079 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.8971910112 46% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.