Claim: Researchers should not limit their investigations to only those areas in which they expect to discover something that has an immediate, practical application.
Reason: It is impossible to predict the outcome of a line of research with any certainty.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
It is said that investigations done by researchers should not be limited to the only those that have immediate, practical outcomes. Also, the output of any research is not certain and clear.
Nowadays, scientific researches have grown in importance. They have vital importance in this competitive world. We cannot undergo developments without serious research works. People who pursue research are regarded with high prestige and are considered equivalent to gods as they gift the society important achievements with their creativity and inventions. Research work requires patience and diligent effort to achieve success. With the introduction of new technologies, people tend to achieve success in researches immediately and in a short time. Therefore, researches are limited to an immediate and practical application that is highly contentious. Some searches need years of effort and analysis, and they cannot have immediate outcomes. For example, the researches about space need some complex analysis, and most of the time it takes many years that researches achieve success, and even sometimes experts cannot predict the outcome of such investigations.
The ultimate aim of the research is to establish a new concept. Investigations with new concepts are useless unless they meet the needs of people in society. We can see that, in reality, all achievements of renowned scientists that now we enjoy were not highly considered during those scientists ‘period. For instance, the invention of the airplane by the Wright brothers. In their period, this invention was not important and it was considered silly. In the olden days, in Wright ‘s period the invention of the airplane had no useful outcome for people because if they wanted to go traveling, they only used carriage or the car and even walked in periodic rest. By contrast, now we cannot imagine traveling to another country without using an airplane. This invention has had its achievements for people after a long period. so, we can see that most of the researchers gain the desired results after some years.
In addition to this, most of the researchers cannot discover something that has an immediate, practical application because most of their inventions are beyond the mind of people in their period and they cannot understand them. For example, in olden days people could not have imagined individuals would walk on the moon in the future but people who worked in NASA could achieve it and showed this ability when people were able to perceive this achievement. Also, nowadays some institutions like NASA have started some researches that they do not know exactly about the result of them, and they try to show their new achievements with some science fiction movies to people to prepare them to accept their achievements.
In conclusion, I believe that Researchers should not restrict their researches to only ones in which they are expected to discover something that has an immediate, practical application because most of the investigations do not an exact result and they need years of effort.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 837, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
...vements for people after a long period. so, we can see that most of the researcher...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, therefore, even so, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 33.0505617978 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 67.0 58.6224719101 114% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2592.0 2235.4752809 116% => OK
No of words: 491.0 442.535393258 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27902240326 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70728369723 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89467194826 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 215.323595506 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.468431771894 0.4932671777 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 805.5 704.065955056 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.1608970144 60.3974514979 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.0 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4583333333 23.4991977007 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.83333333333 5.21951772744 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.320454474999 0.243740707755 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0991284462327 0.0831039109588 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0959881989716 0.0758088955206 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.240147216669 0.150359130593 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110750498628 0.0667264976115 166% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 14.1392134831 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.1639044944 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 100.480337079 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.