The best ideas arise from a passionate interest in commonplace things Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporting your

Essay topics:

The best ideas arise from a passionate interest in commonplace things.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.

The author contends that best ideas are drawn from ordinary things while having a fervid interest in the subject. In my opinion, I partially agree with the author for the following reasons.
To begin with, ideas are created in a person’s mind depending his the interest where, the subject in which he focuses upon might depend on ordinary or complex things. For example, Albert Einstine is a great mathematician know for a lot of contribution in the field of math. Even though math is considered as the toughest subject, Einstine discovered great ideas and proved a lot of theorems. Similarly, Ramanujam also contributed to the math field by finding the number 0 and adding it to the number system. Thus, not all best ideas are derived from commonplace things.
However, there are studies which has contributed to best ideas from commonplace things. For example, in the field of technology, Internet of things abbreviated as IOT makes use of different devices that can connect to each other thought wireless communication and can be used to send information from one device to many other devices. It is the innovators passion and hard work that lead to ideas like Bluetooth, wi-fi, Ethernet etc. Hence, there are also ideas which are considered to be best in commonplace things.
Also, not all best ideas are obtained from people who had great passion. Let’s take for example, Sir Issac Newton, a great physician was simply sitting under a tree and got hit by an apple from the tree. His curiosity was the tool to formulate theory of gravitation and newton’s laws. These laws are facts and are still followed by physicians and mathematicians; therefore, it is hard to say that Newton had a passionate interest on the apple to find out why it fell. Hence, best ideas depends upon a person’s perspective of viewing the problem and might not be a passionate interest.
In conclusion, best ideas can be discovered by people who are interested in commonplace thing; however, that might not be the case for all ideas. People views problems in different ways and innovators tend to find a solution for those problems though it might not be their field of study.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 51, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'to the best'.
Suggestion: to the best
...there are studies which has contributed to best ideas from commonplace things. For exam...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 346, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'innovators'' or 'innovator's'?
Suggestion: innovators'; innovator's
...device to many other devices. It is the innovators passion and hard work that lead to idea...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 474, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ', the best'.
Suggestion: , the best
...the apple to find out why it fell. Hence, best ideas depends upon a person’s perspecti...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 15, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ', the best'.
Suggestion: , the best
...e a passionate interest. In conclusion, best ideas can be discovered by people who a...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, similarly, so, still, therefore, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, in my opinion, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1806.0 2235.4752809 81% => OK
No of words: 367.0 442.535393258 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92098092643 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73137081336 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 215.323595506 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.506811989101 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 557.1 704.065955056 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.6037768982 60.3974514979 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.333333333 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3888888889 23.4991977007 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.38888888889 5.21951772744 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209007613673 0.243740707755 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0776666881265 0.0831039109588 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0548514771799 0.0758088955206 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124884388673 0.150359130593 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0277399247818 0.0667264976115 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 14.1392134831 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 100.480337079 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.