The best ideas arise from a passionate interests in commonplace things.
Where do greatest ideas from? That is a question with different answers for disparate people. I concede that the best ideas are the result after one's understanding and experiences of normal things up to certain extent. I believe only aspirants heading to certain fields could come up with them. But there still remain some who hold different opinions that, greatest ideas need dedications that could not be achieved by ordinary people, thus leaving the best idea a mysterious mask.
A part of people regard ideas possessing higher quality as a result of super special combination, that includes proposer's diligence, opportunities, relations and the type of the idea. They still accept the claim that the best ideas could be made through passionate interests, but where can them be extracted is discussed. For example, the research papers are a paragon for researchers in astronomer studies, and that is where them express their ideas regarding the universe. We could say the papers are their work of dedications, but cannot say they are extracted from commonplace things, in that theories about the space need studiers to accomplish years of studies to propose, which is far more over the standard for commonplace. And such esoteric formulas and jargons hinder layperson to fully get the point. Moreover, the experiment facilities and observant machines are hard mandatory conditions for proposing such important ideas. So if two intellectual-equal people are conducting the same project, and one of them has enough condition and the other has not, the best ideas are not from a passionate interest in commonplace things but from a passionate interests in conditional places.
However, while the example mentioned before contains its understandableness, we fail to talk about it into different context: universe ideas on professional papers are cryptic, but they are really happening in our world, its profoundness is just for human beings but not for the nature, so naturally speaking, the ideas are still in commonplaces. As for the devices and machines, they are not supportive evidence to attribute universe study as a research with multiple obstacles, because why we feel it requires a lot just due to the perspective we used to evaluate it is our own, we should view it from an astronomist, who feels no startles at all when seeing those facilities which are not uncommon in that field. More importantly, those esoteric ideas are also composed by several simple formulas and definitions, from such angle, why does not those ideas be regarded as commonplaces?
In sum, some people try to cite certain ideas' underlying features and special properties when proposing it to undermine such a claim, but I think their citation is wrong, and any uneasy to understand ideas and related needed equipment could be viewed from other perspective. But what we should focus on is what stays unchangeable at all time, which is a claim that the best ideas do come from a passionate interest.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 7, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'do the greatest'.
Suggestion: do the greatest
Where do greatest ideas from? That is a question with dif...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 146, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...hat the best ideas are the result after ones understanding and experiences of normal...
^^^^
Line 1, column 356, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ', the greatest'.
Suggestion: , the greatest
...in some who hold different opinions that, greatest ideas need dedications that could not b...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 445, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'research'.
Suggestion: research
...evidence to attribute universe study as a research with multiple obstacles, because why we...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, really, regarding, so, still, thus, while, as for, for example, i think, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.3162921348 177% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 33.0505617978 127% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2507.0 2235.4752809 112% => OK
No of words: 486.0 442.535393258 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15843621399 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69525374022 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93090294003 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 258.0 215.323595506 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530864197531 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 783.0 704.065955056 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 10.0 1.77640449438 563% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 23.0359550562 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 94.2209726945 60.3974514979 156% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.470588235 118.986275619 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5882352941 23.4991977007 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.94117647059 5.21951772744 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.335990459335 0.243740707755 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111101359255 0.0831039109588 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115335904008 0.0758088955206 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210579481701 0.150359130593 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0709242850884 0.0667264976115 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 14.1392134831 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 48.8420337079 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.24 12.1639044944 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 100.480337079 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 11.2143820225 118% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.