Young people are the backbone of any nation, but how to well prepare them for future leadership? Some people may argue that the ultimate way by instilling in them the spirit of cooperation, not competition. In my opinion, I agree with the author that cooperation is more pivotal. However, at the same time, competition is also required in many other aspects.
First of all, young men are a linchpin part to achieve welfare and prosperity. Countries like Japan, China, and the USA, which have made good use of their youth, stand on the top of developed nations. Therefore, it has become vital to well prepare yougth for leading their countries. For me, as a young man, raising the spirit of cooperation is really the best solution sothat increasing the belonging and sincerity to our countries. This should be from earlier ages, governments should encourage schools to help students cooperate with each other in all aspects.
Moreover, cooperation can learn may positive aspects. For example, a recent study that is published by Harvard University had shown that their graduates who participate in volunteering organizations to help others have achieved higher progress when they become older. And many of them hold a leading position in large companies or even political parties.
On the other side, there are other fields which do not depend on cooperation. For example, in individual sports like Karate in which only one player against another. In order for a country to achieve excellence in such sports, competition is the best solution. So if players could compete with each other instead of co-operating, they would achieve better performance in worldwide champions.
To sum up, it appears to me that cooperation should be installed in to our young people to achieve progress in areas like industry and leading the country. However, Competition may seem important in the sports world.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, really, so, still, therefore, well, for example, first of all, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1596.0 2235.4752809 71% => OK
No of words: 309.0 442.535393258 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16504854369 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78778874927 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 215.323595506 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.601941747573 0.4932671777 122% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 704.065955056 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.7474013466 60.3974514979 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.6666666667 118.986275619 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1666666667 23.4991977007 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.38888888889 5.21951772744 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218788350371 0.243740707755 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0668431341717 0.0831039109588 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0620855610423 0.0758088955206 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116783057716 0.150359130593 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0709071047088 0.0667264976115 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.41 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 100.480337079 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.