The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition.
If we go through some of the breakthrough research papers, we seldom see any seminal work being done by a lone researcher; more often than not it is a collaboration of like-minded individuals that drives the phenomenal results. This is also the case across different domains ranging from sports to business.
As more commonly said - "Two brains working together is more powerful than them working individually", one can argue that collaboration results in developing more intricate details of an idea as opposed to one individual doing the entirety of the task. Since humans are inherently flawed, it is very likely that the person might miss some of the essential details of the task at hand. So, another pair of eyes is definitely handy to identify and solve the possible mistakes.
For instance, we can analyze the field of programming. Suppose a lone developer is building the entire software, it will be biased towards the strengths and weaknesses of that particular developer. It is very hard to ensure that there are no loopholes in this kind of systems as it is solely based on one person's logic and it is not verified by anyone else. If we instigated a sense of competition instead of cooperation among the two programmers to compete against each other to finish a task, it would create a sense of urgency and it is likely that both of them might end up doing a sloppy work.
However, there are some instances where the task demands to be done entirely by a single individual. A perfect example of this can be taken by the world of art where we seldom see collaborative work. This argument can be supported by looking into the famous masterpieces throughout the history like the Mona Lisa. In this case, if there was an intervention of fellow artists it is likely that the artwork would be adulterated and the end result might not have been as impressive as it is now.
Going along the lines of the above arguments, it is better to prepare young people of a society to instill a sense of cooperation instead of competition.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 18, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
If we go through some of the breakthrough research papers, we seldom...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 345, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... very likely that the person might miss some of the essential details of the task at hand. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, so, still, for instance, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 14.8657303371 34% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1700.0 2235.4752809 76% => OK
No of words: 354.0 442.535393258 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80225988701 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87861138248 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 215.323595506 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.562146892655 0.4932671777 114% => OK
syllable_count: 558.9 704.065955056 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.9573705175 60.3974514979 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.428571429 118.986275619 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2857142857 23.4991977007 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.07142857143 5.21951772744 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.095465370986 0.243740707755 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0355439238684 0.0831039109588 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0722432759818 0.0758088955206 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.07367472151 0.150359130593 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0962898768455 0.0667264976115 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 100.480337079 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.