Young generation is often seen as progressive and torch bearers of the relay that we call development of society and nation. Cooperation and competition, have their fundamental differences in the way it is accomplished. However, depending on either of the two would be inefficient way to progress by any society or nation. Cooperation brings people together and manifests a sense of collective responsibility towards other member of the society. Whereas, competition breeds from fighting spirit and an eagerness to improve to perform better than your competitor. If a society wants to develop young people for leadership roles. It must must focus on exposing young people to the combination of both concepts, as both have their inherent flaws and strengths.
Cooperation is a always a mutual feeling, common benefit is the highest aim for any set of people engaged in cooperation. It has been observed that cooperation is rampant in society where there is apparent dearth of resources. Members forming collectives to help each other in case of adversities. This works as a safety net for people struggling to arrange sufficient resources of their living. Whereas, competition in itself a sense of establishing superiority over competitor. Competition begs people to keep innovating keep innovating to stay ahead and also envision the future. It keeps people on their toes all the time and poses many real world critical questions.
Both the concepts are different and complex, to a degree that once society chooses either of them there is nearly no turning back. Cooperation is much more complex concept than competition, where for every decision to be taken, a mass consensus is required from all members. On top of it, there is always a sense of inequity among members and a sense of distrust about the the way cooperation is being done. However, cooperation also yields virtues, such as building consensus, team spirit, importance of help and support. There are some traits a society would want in their young generation.
While, competition enables people to think ahead of the time and keep innovating. It sometimes becomes the compulsion for participants in competition to keep innovating just for sake of it otherwise if they will not innovate they will lag behind. Competition, as we observed manifested by spread of capitalism, which in turn caused uses unfair practices as well as harming the nature. It is not a particular correct way of doing things and people do diverge from standard practices to develop better ideas and hence harming ecosystem around them. Competition though develops vision, critical thinking, innovation and though leadership among its participants and society wants these skills in young people too.
Hence, in my view society must strive to strike a balance between the two and should facilitate the exposure between the two. People of different kind and thinking would like either of them, they should be free to chose. However, society must ensure the necessary skills are there in young generation to carry on the development process either by cooperation or competition.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 632, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: must
...p young people for leadership roles. It must must focus on exposing young people to the c...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 16, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... flaws and strengths. Cooperation is a always a mutual feeling, common benefit...
^
Line 3, column 397, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e sufficient resources of their living. Whereas, competition in itself a sense of estab...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 508, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'keep innovating'.
Suggestion: keep innovating
... competitor. Competition begs people to keep innovating keep innovating to stay ahead and also envision the fut...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 673, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ses many real world critical questions. Both the concepts are different and comp...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 370, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...g members and a sense of distrust about the the way cooperation is being done. However,...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 370, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...g members and a sense of distrust about the the way cooperation is being done. However,...
^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... either by cooperation or competition.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, however, if, so, well, whereas, while, such as, as well as, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 58.6224719101 119% => OK
Nominalization: 27.0 12.9106741573 209% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2630.0 2235.4752809 118% => OK
No of words: 500.0 442.535393258 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72870804502 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91502041159 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 256.0 215.323595506 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.512 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 819.0 704.065955056 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.2370786517 133% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.3566352981 60.3974514979 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 97.4074074074 118.986275619 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5185185185 23.4991977007 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.07407407407 5.21951772744 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2916092021 0.243740707755 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0753718243388 0.0831039109588 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0593789748329 0.0758088955206 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162193386725 0.150359130593 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.039014463552 0.0667264976115 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 14.1392134831 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.1639044944 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 100.480337079 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.