Decision as it may seem sounds a logical phenomena. Decision are always bound to affect the individual taking the decision as well as many others related to the individuals. We as a society always try to enforce the idea of rational decision making, which takes into account multiple factors and situations. To thoroughly reject emotional decisions should not be the norm. Rather if there are emotional circumstances then we must prudently portray it as emotional rather than justifying based on logical rationals.
Emotional decisions are not always poor and decision makers using emotions while decisions making are not always poor decision makers. For example, if somebody donates half of his or her wealth to fight hunger and poverty prevalent in his region should not be called in for scrutiny. It should be lauded as good decision so that other people in the region can also benefit from the riches of the person. While, if somebody in rage beats up another man just for no good reason and later goes on elaborating and lying about the reasons should be called as poor decision maker. The person should have kept his composure and shouldn't have hit another man!
On the other hand all logical decisions are also not good decisions. The logic and rational sometimes cause relentless damage to many aspect of our lives. Take for example, the billion dollar cola corporation decides to increase its operation into a geographically arid region, to increase business outreach and make more money. At outset it reflects the sound financial planning on part of the cola corporation. Whereas, it has potential to seriously damage the surrounding environment. Cola factory sucks off underground fresh water and sugar mixed cola drinks wreck havoc on the health of human bring, so in effect seriously undermining the health of local residents.
Hence, in totality we can conclude that it does not matter whether decision maker is using emotions or logic, what makes a decision effective is its nature of impact and present context. Emotional context requires emotional solution while logical contexts require logical solutions. Having said that, we should not overlook the intricate interplay between emotions and logic during decision making process.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 42, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'phenomenon'?
Suggestion: phenomenon
...ecision as it may seem sounds a logical phenomena. Decision are always bound to affect th...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 374, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Rather,
...ional decisions should not be the norm. Rather if there are emotional circumstances th...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 622, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
...rson should have kept his composure and shouldnt have hit another man! On the other h...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 130, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun aspect seems to be countable; consider using: 'many aspects'.
Suggestion: many aspects
...al sometimes cause relentless damage to many aspect of our lives. Take for example, the bil...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 414, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...anning on part of the cola corporation. Whereas, it has potential to seriously damage t...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 564, Rule ID: WRECK_HAVOC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'wreak havoc'?
Suggestion: wreak havoc
...fresh water and sugar mixed cola drinks wreck havoc on the health of human bring, so in eff...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 408, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d logic during decision making process.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, if, look, may, so, then, well, whereas, while, for example, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 58.6224719101 63% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1894.0 2235.4752809 85% => OK
No of words: 363.0 442.535393258 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21763085399 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62045020043 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575757575758 0.4932671777 117% => OK
syllable_count: 605.7 704.065955056 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.0373282615 60.3974514979 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.222222222 118.986275619 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1666666667 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.21951772744 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.420059109283 0.243740707755 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134531271128 0.0831039109588 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.12861100589 0.0758088955206 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.252155381656 0.150359130593 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102395278666 0.0667264976115 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 48.8420337079 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.38706741573 110% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 100.480337079 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.