The lecturer in her talk has raised some questions over the benefits of salvage logging, explained in the text. The lecturer serially refutes each claim using examples of diverse nature.
First, text claims that salvage logging is good for the jungle, since it does not prevent the growth of new trees by occupying the space. The lecturer on the other hand, dismisses the argument by quoting, that tree decay is a natural process, which contributes immensely towards the improvement of soil nutrients in the jungle. Hence propelling future growth of trees.
Second, Lecturer argues that all the insects are not bad even spruce bark beetle lived in Alaskan forests for hundreds of years without causing any large scale damage. According to the lecturer the dead trees not only act as shelter for beetles and insects but also for different types animals and birds. These species are also equally important to the environment. Whereas text claims beetles severely damage healthy trees and dead trees help in their manifestation.
Finally, lecturers disagrees with the argument of economic benefits of the salvage logging as mentioned in the text. Text claims that salvage logging helps in providing additional lumber to industry and creating job opportunities for local residents. Lecturers disagrees by quoting that there are high costs involved in salvaging logging, particularly through usage of high end vehicles or even helicopter. In addition to it, lecturer says that, quantity of salvaged good might not worth the effort as after fire only small quantity of good wood can be salvaged, hence it could prove costly and futile exercise. Furthermore, lecturer claims that salvage logging needs specialized skills. Local residents might not be expert in salvage logging hence the jobs will be created for people from outside as well as since forest fire is not a frequent phenomenon hence the jobs can be temporary in nature.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 329, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...vement of soil nutrients in the jungle. Hence propelling future growth of trees. S...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 669, Rule ID: NEEDS_FIXED[1]
Message: "needs specialized" is only accepted in certain dialects. For something more widely acceptable, try 'specializing' or 'to be specialized'.
Suggestion: specializing; to be specialized
...turer claims that salvage logging needs specialized skills. Local residents might not be ex...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, hence, if, second, so, well, whereas, in addition, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 22.412803532 58% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 30.3222958057 125% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1629.0 1373.03311258 119% => OK
No of words: 310.0 270.72406181 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25483870968 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53885723226 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 145.348785872 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587096774194 0.540411800872 109% => OK
syllable_count: 497.7 419.366225166 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.23620309051 36% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.2569398193 49.2860985944 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.6 110.228320801 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 21.698381199 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06452816374 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.342549745479 0.272083759551 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110078919645 0.0996497079465 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0650415105805 0.0662205650399 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179765321331 0.162205337803 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0817542884468 0.0443174109184 184% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.3589403974 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.2367328918 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.42419426049 109% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 63.6247240618 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.