The author in the passage has first argued in favor of inoculations against cow flu and later himself presented a counter argument that routine inoculations cannot be permitted. However, we will analyze the inherent assumptions and specific evidence needed to evaluate the argument.
Cow flu has been mentioned as cause of many deaths in the areas where cow flu was detected. Author has not presented any specific data to corroborate the statement. We do not know actually how many people lost there lives due to cow flu. It could be any number and we cannot ascertain from the argument that what was the actual number.
It would be interesting to know that what is the duration of effectiveness of inoculation. If we know the frequency with which the inoculation need to administered, it would be easy to plan as well as understand that was it actually the cause which was responsible for deaths in the region.
Second part of the argument states that there is very small possibility that a person would die as a result of inoculations and hence it cannot be permitted against cow flu to be routinely administered. I agree with author that indeed every life is important and every individual has a right to live. However, the exact probability of a person dying due to inoculation should be presented. If, for example, there is one in a million probability of a person dying due to inoculation and we have a thousand in a million people dying due to non administration, we must evaluate the position seriously. This can be either way too if cost in terms of peoples lives is too high than lives saved.
Also, we would need to know the cow flu detection mechanisms. Are we correctly able to identify disease symptoms and spread area? Are we able to demarcate the region where it is spreading? Is there presence of medical services? Can the flu treated at an early stage? Is there another way to solve the cow flu problem?
As a matter of fact, we would also require evidence from medical researchers that there is no alternative to inoculations against cow flu. As well as, the prevention mechanisms. If we have a safe alternative available to inoculation then inoculation can be eliminated from the picture as well as if prevention is possible, then a public awareness program needs to be developed.
Hence, in all fairness we need some substantial evidence to evaluate the argument such as the extent of people deceased due to cow flu, frequency of inoculation administration, possibility figures of people losing their lives due to inoculation as well as any available safe alternative to inoculation and prevention mechanism if any. If we can find these evidences then it will prudent to evaluate both measures of introduction of another measure such as alternative method of inoculation.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, first, hence, however, if, second, so, then, well, for example, such as, as a matter of fact, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 29.0 12.9106741573 225% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2336.0 2235.4752809 104% => OK
No of words: 475.0 442.535393258 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91789473684 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66845742379 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98298480351 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 215.323595506 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.435789473684 0.4932671777 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 776.7 704.065955056 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 71.2292733011 60.3974514979 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.3333333333 118.986275619 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7916666667 23.4991977007 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.54166666667 5.21951772744 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.97078651685 141% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 5.13820224719 234% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.329076852222 0.243740707755 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0922261641662 0.0831039109588 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0863682212599 0.0758088955206 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158901922729 0.150359130593 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0801014536261 0.0667264976115 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 14.1392134831 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 100.480337079 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.