The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
The leader plays a vital role in the development and path to success of any government, industry, or other field. He is someone who encourages and bolsters the employees, therefore a leader should be someone with a sense of cooperative mind than competitive.
The motivation for being a leader should be encouraged from the early stages of life; Since, childhood is where everyone learns the values and principles of society. A leader should not be greedy and selfish, instead, he should play a very important role in developing the whole industry or government alongside his own development. For example, Ratan Tata of India is a great leader, who donates the majority of his life savings to charity and also to the development of society.
A leader should not only think about one own improvement, instead should think about the betterment of the people and the government. He should take everyone's opinions into consideration before starting any development or scheme. The leader should take critical decisions in planning the development of the society. Instead, of example, if a local leader of a city, wastefully using the government funding for his own purpose and needs, instead of using it for crucial developments like improving the standard of living of the people of the society, will not only hinder his high standard role but also causes the downfall of the society and increase in poverty.
In Conclusion, the development of society majorly depends on the leader. Therefore, the leader should be someone who is cooperative and thinks about the people by taking everything into consideration before making any decision, instead of being competitive, thereby improving the well being the people and the government.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, therefore, well, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 33.0505617978 24% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 58.6224719101 67% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1457.0 2235.4752809 65% => OK
No of words: 280.0 442.535393258 63% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20357142857 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.55969084622 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90305741365 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 215.323595506 64% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.492857142857 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 464.4 704.065955056 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.2370786517 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 75.7781668986 60.3974514979 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.454545455 118.986275619 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4545454545 23.4991977007 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.63636363636 5.21951772744 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0845239099588 0.243740707755 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0366641231781 0.0831039109588 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0243760769559 0.0758088955206 32% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0600724926122 0.150359130593 40% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00389218837126 0.0667264976115 6% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 14.1392134831 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 48.8420337079 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.1639044944 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 100.480337079 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.