The best way to solve environmental problems caused by consumer-generated waste is for towns and cities to impose strict limits on the amount of trash they will accept from each household.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Does imposing a limit for amount of consumer –generated wastes received from each household will reduce the environmental problems caused by these wastes? As industrialization started growing, wastes produced by each household are also growing. Technology has developed, there are other ways to reduce the environmental problems caused by consumer –generated wastes. I disagree with solution provided by author in limiting the amount of waste received from each household. Let analyze the issue in detail.
First, restricting amount of waste may seemed a good solution by some critics. Technology has improved. There are so many countries implemented human-waste management to reduce the environmental problems. Some of the technologies that recycles ton of consumer produced wastes into energy. For example European Unions are using waste-to–energy management in order to convert waste to energy. The tons of wastes can be converted into energy in kilowatt, gas and bio –organic fertilizers.
Moreover, Wastes are bio-degradable and non-bio degradable. Non–bio degradable wastes are plastic, glass materials-wastes etc. Indeed they can be recycled and reused. For example, plastic materials can be recycled and reproduced. One of the way is to reduce use of plastic materials. Consequently environmental problems will be reduced.
Finally, restricting the amount will result in increase of waste on other areas such park, river areas, and so on. People will eventually start dumping the more consumer generated wastes in the parks, riverside areas, and wastelands during the night. This will result in causing more environmental problems to the cities than collecting whole consumer generated wastes. Indeed this will cost the local municipality to clean. Therefore The solution provided by author may not be better solution considering all possibilities .
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Does imposing a limit for amount of co...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 28, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Does imposing a limit for amount of consumer –generated wastes...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ld. Let analyze the issue in detail. First, restricting amount of waste may s...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 216, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: Some
...t to reduce the environmental problems. Some of the technologies that recycles ton of consu...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 311, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...produced wastes into energy. For example European Unions are using waste-to–ene...
^^^
Line 3, column 333, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nergy. For example European Unions are using waste-to–energy management in orde...
^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t, gas and bio –organic fertilizers. Moreover, Wastes are bio-degradable and ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 138, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...are plastic, glass materials-wastes etc. Indeed they can be recycled and reused. ...
^^
Line 5, column 297, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Consequently,
... is to reduce use of plastic materials. Consequently environmental problems will be reduced....
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ironmental problems will be reduced. Finally, restricting the amount will res...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 379, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Indeed,
...ecting whole consumer generated wastes. Indeed this will cost the local municipality t...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 434, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...l cost the local municipality to clean. Therefore The solution provided by author may not...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 532, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...r solution considering all possibilities .
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, finally, first, may, moreover, so, therefore, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 11.3162921348 9% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 6.0 33.0505617978 18% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 58.6224719101 67% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1602.0 2235.4752809 72% => OK
No of words: 276.0 442.535393258 62% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.80434782609 5.05705443957 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.55969084622 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19985956762 2.79657885939 114% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 215.323595506 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.561594202899 0.4932671777 114% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 704.065955056 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.59117977528 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 23.0359550562 52% => Sentence length is too short
Sentence length SD: 34.3252852371 60.3974514979 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 72.8181818182 118.986275619 61% => OK
Words per sentence: 12.5454545455 23.4991977007 53% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.21951772744 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 13.0 7.80617977528 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 5.13820224719 234% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278130524826 0.243740707755 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0827013425869 0.0831039109588 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0879742468895 0.0758088955206 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174832082962 0.150359130593 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103260763059 0.0667264976115 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 33.92 48.8420337079 69% => It means the essay is relatively harder to read.
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.47 12.1639044944 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.38706741573 111% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 100.480337079 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.8 11.2143820225 61% => Gunning_fog is low.
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.