The best way to solve environmental problems caused by consumer-generated waste is for towns and cities to impose strict limits on the amount of trash they will accept from each household.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree

Essay topics:

The best way to solve environmental problems caused by consumer-generated waste is for towns and cities to impose strict limits on the amount of trash they will accept from each household.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.

Waste disposal has been issue as from the time humans started building cities. For instance, in the world’s oldest civilisation of mohenjodaro, sewers were built to take the waste from the cities. The prompt says that the best way to stop environmental damage caused by consumer-generated waste impose strict limits on the amount of trash cities and towns will accept from each household. I strongly disagree with this statement because of the following reasons.
Where would the waste the city is unwilling to take go? It would most likely end up being dumped hapahazardly, without proper procedures, at a place, where it would lcause more damage. Waste disposed without proper procedures would most lead to more diseases, more unsansitary conditions than the waste which the city disposes of itself.

Each household is different and depending on the number of people, the place of residence, the resources available to the people to prevent enivornmental damage, the quantity of waste varies. For example, a family of five lives in a house and a elderly couple live in one, the amount of trash will be different for both of them. Furthermore, if a household doesn’t get satisfactory quality drinking water and they have to install a reverse osmosis water purifer( it wastes half the water it takes as input) for needs, the familyshould not be punished for this wastage.
Quality of the trash also differs among households. Take an example where a household generates more waste but most of it is recyclable, it should not be punished and a household generating lower quantity of waste but majority of it non recyclable, let go. Expalning this further, if the people living in the city are unable to compost their own waste because of no space then they should not be penalised for no fault of their own.
The best way to solve environmental problems caused by consumer-generated waste is to take measures such reduce excessive packaging for example banning sliced bananas in plastic container even though nature has provided the fruit with its own bio degradable covering. Provide the people with more services such as helping them in composting their waste, providing them with more eco friendly options and educating them about them.This is the right way to stop consumer generated waste.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 244, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
..., a family of five lives in a house and a elderly couple live in one, the amount ...
^
Line 6, column 431, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: This
...y options and educating them about them.This is the right way to stop consumer gener...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, so, then, for example, for instance, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1929.0 2235.4752809 86% => OK
No of words: 378.0 442.535393258 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10317460317 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40933352052 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8465030678 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.4932671777 113% => OK
syllable_count: 618.3 704.065955056 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.7691585945 60.3974514979 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.6 118.986275619 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2 23.4991977007 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8 5.21951772744 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 10.2758426966 10% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 5.13820224719 234% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296024070156 0.243740707755 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0969428844254 0.0831039109588 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116520298266 0.0758088955206 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156599512727 0.150359130593 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0902951744098 0.0667264976115 135% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 14.1392134831 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 100.480337079 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.