The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative actions.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent you agree or disagree with the recommendation made. Describe specific circumstances in adopting recommendation would or wouldn't advantageous.
While it is true that highlighting negative actions of a person often irritates him/her and doesn’t serve to teach them as intended, but it is also probable that ignoring negative actions of a person every time doesn’t make them realise their mistakes. I believe as appreciating the positive actions of any person enhances their enthusiasm to work properly, pointing out any person’s negative actions in a subtle way helps them to understand their mistakes.
Firstly, from our experiences it is quite obvious that the manner of pointing out mistakes plays an important role in teaching anyone. An acerbic tone always causes negative unintended effects. To exemplify, once I abused my friend as she hadn’t been studying before exam. Though my intention was to make her study, due to my harsh words had detrimental effect on her. She cried for a day and obviously didn’t study for that day. After that incident, whenever I want to make people realise their mistakes, I practiced the habit of persuading people with all my patience.
Secondly, ignoring negative actions of anyone may sum up excusable mistakes to devastating damage. For example, in order to maintain the healthy relationship, we often tend to ignore others mistakes. In that process we may pave way to imperils. As my guide pf my project, even after understanding that there had been error in my experimental procedure couldn’t tell me aware of it. That is because he didn’t want me to lose my spirit. But, by doing such wrong procedure I couldn’t get good results and then I had to repeat the experiments again for next three months.
Having said above, highlighting positive actions of anyone is a good practice. I feel any good action deserves applause. The practice the giving Noble prizes, Oscar awards, any many other such events suggests that the virtuoso of all fields deserves the praise. So, generalizing that the best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative actions is not appropriate.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 417, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a subtle way" with adverb for "subtle"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... out any person's negative actions in a subtle way helps them to understand their mistakes...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 385, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...re negative actions is not appropriate.
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, thus, while, as to, for example, i feel, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 12.4196629213 16% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 14.8657303371 34% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 33.0505617978 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 58.6224719101 68% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 12.9106741573 15% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1700.0 2235.4752809 76% => OK
No of words: 331.0 442.535393258 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13595166163 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90290982969 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 215.323595506 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583081570997 0.4932671777 118% => OK
syllable_count: 540.0 704.065955056 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 55.7472526035 60.3974514979 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.4444444444 118.986275619 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3888888889 23.4991977007 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.38888888889 5.21951772744 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 5.13820224719 214% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125273233707 0.243740707755 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0443315449252 0.0831039109588 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0680318446073 0.0758088955206 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.084184634275 0.150359130593 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.052894737053 0.0667264976115 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 14.1392134831 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 100.480337079 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.