The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.
An individual character is a valuable asset. People always expect propriety behavior from others. One possesses typical qualities (both positive behavior and negative behavior) that they inherit from very childhood. I agree with the first half of the statement and but can’t agree with the second half. We should cultivate decorous characters in children, praise positive actions and not simply ignoring their bad behavior, but rather instructing them how they are wrong and what people expect them to do in such scenario.
In our childhood, parents are our first teachers who teach us all the moral, social norms. They teach us everything right from uttering inchoate words to how we should behave to others. If they find us doing disruptive things or committing inappropriate behaviors ”What they do?”. They tell us how our behaviors are not good, what consequences it is going to have. They instruct so clearly to make sure that these mistakes will not happen again. For example, if a child is found playing carelessly near the road side, then parents tell him/her not to play as passing by vehicles might hurt you and you will feel pain. So, that things will stuck in our mind and we never do that thing again.
Furthermore, what if a child exhibiting inappropriate behavior is just ignored? He would never come to know what is wrong or right. And he will continue doing the same things. For example, one of my friend always bites his nail, which, as per him, acquired right from his childhood. His parents just ignored this behavior rather than discouraging him to do such things by telling him the negative consequences that can cause to the health.
Some people might argue that there is nothing wrong to ignore negative characters provided you praise the positive actions. They opine that praising positive actions by giving them tangible or intangible things keep encouraging them to show same behavior. If positive actions are encouraged, even the one who is showing negative traits later on will be motivated to behave well. Undoubtedly, it is to be noted that praising positive actions will act as an impetus to further correct the characters of both good behaving and badly behaving child; however, simply ignoring without educating your child about bad behavior will not stop your child to repeat same things in near future.
In conclusion, of course, every parents, teachers should instill morally good characters in their child by praising them for the positive characters they show; however, if children happen to commit negative beviour, they should not be just ignored. Ignoring such things might motivate the children to do even more wrongdoings in later stages, and also they might not understand “is it really the bad thing they are doing”.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 650, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'stick'
Suggestion: stick
...ou will feel pain. So, that things will stuck in our mind and we never do that thing ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 683, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d to repeat same things in near future. In conclusion, of course, every parents,...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 434, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lly the bad thing they are doing'.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, really, second, so, still, then, well, for example, in conclusion, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 60.0 33.0505617978 182% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 12.9106741573 8% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2339.0 2235.4752809 105% => OK
No of words: 458.0 442.535393258 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10698689956 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62611441266 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57442747378 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 215.323595506 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497816593886 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 696.6 704.065955056 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 65.3575305936 60.3974514979 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.695652174 118.986275619 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9130434783 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.21739130435 5.21951772744 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174049078195 0.243740707755 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0527584915292 0.0831039109588 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0631765031138 0.0758088955206 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108505621954 0.150359130593 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0763150387177 0.0667264976115 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 14.1392134831 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 100.480337079 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.