the best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.
If you want something to grow, focus on it. Going by this statement we can assume that to teach someone a lesson, we must ignore their negative actions and focus on the positive ones only by praising them. However, it would be false to assume complete authencity of this statement without considering the possible consequences of following such a rule.
Even though I believe in focusing on the positive actions of a person rather than the negative ones, I do not agee with completely ignoring the negative ones as it might not always lead to the desired consequence of teaching one something. This could be for a variety of reasons and circumstances. Firstly, the person might not be aware of the fault or the mistake he or she has committed. Not making him aware of what you percieve as wrong, only makes him more likely to committing it again in future. Also, there can be circumstances where two people don't agree on what's right and what's not. Hence, only if you make the other person aware of your point of view, can he say if he agrees or disagrees with it. It is important to have such a discussion to teach someone a value and not make him repeat a negative action in future. Until and unless he is convinced about what he did was wrong, he is likely to repeat it in future without a drop of guilt.
In other situations, only praising one and not pointing out his mistakes might lead to one falsely believing in his own superiority, it might lead to arrogance which is definitely not a desirable consequence especially if the person you are dealing with is a child as the characterstics/beliefs formed in childhood stay with one for the rest of their lives.
Overall, even though the focus should be on praising one's positive actions, one must also be made aware of his mistakes in a constructive way. Praises should be given in front of a thousand people, however, crtiticizm should be given privately and in a compassionate way in which the person feels most receptive to a constructive feedback.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 493, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
... him more likely to committing it again in future. Also, there can be circumstances where...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 554, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...e can be circumstances where two people dont agree on whats right and whats not. Hen...
^^^^
Line 3, column 568, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: what's
...mstances where two people dont agree on whats right and whats not. Hence, only if you...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 584, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: what's
...wo people dont agree on whats right and whats not. Hence, only if you make the other ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 820, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...d not make him repeat a negative action in future. Until and unless he is convinced about...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 121, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a constructive way" with adverb for "constructive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...must also be made aware of his mistakes in a constructive way. Praises should be given in front of a ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 249, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a compassionate way" with adverb for "compassionate"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...rtiticizm should be given privately and in a compassionate way in which the person feels most receptiv...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'first', 'firstly', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'so', 'then']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.155440414508 0.240241500013 65% => OK
Verbs: 0.173575129534 0.157235817809 110% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0829015544041 0.0880659088768 94% => OK
Adverbs: 0.080310880829 0.0497285424764 161% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0854922279793 0.0444667217837 192% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.134715025907 0.12292977631 110% => OK
Participles: 0.0518134715026 0.0406280797675 128% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.81900461543 2.79330140395 101% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0284974093264 0.030933414821 92% => OK
Particles: 0.00259067357513 0.0016655270985 156% => OK
Determiners: 0.0854922279793 0.0997080785238 86% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0362694300518 0.0249443105267 145% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0129533678756 0.0148568991511 87% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2017.0 2732.02544248 74% => OK
No of words: 356.0 452.878318584 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.66573033708 6.0361032391 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.58838876751 95% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.306179775281 0.366273622748 84% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.219101123596 0.280924506359 78% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.168539325843 0.200843997647 84% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0983146067416 0.132149295362 74% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81900461543 2.79330140395 101% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 219.290929204 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.497191011236 0.48968727796 102% => OK
Word variations: 52.2753433815 55.4138127331 94% => OK
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6194690265 68% => OK
Sentence length: 25.4285714286 23.380412469 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 77.5801100114 59.4972553346 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.071428571 141.124799967 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4285714286 23.380412469 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.571428571429 0.674092028746 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.94800884956 81% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.21349557522 134% => OK
Readability: 47.3386837881 51.4728631049 92% => OK
Elegance: 1.00763358779 1.64882698954 61% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.323447673617 0.391690518653 83% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.114299697691 0.123202303941 93% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0799934162111 0.077325440228 103% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.536368759488 0.547984918172 98% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.20184700432 0.149214159877 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12901423586 0.161403998019 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0884692668396 0.0892212321368 99% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.300344117853 0.385218514788 78% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0657655353367 0.0692045440612 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213788959398 0.275328986314 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0537316233721 0.0653680567796 82% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.4325221239 58% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.30420353982 113% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88274336283 41% => OK
Positive topic words: 5.0 7.22455752212 69% => OK
Negative topic words: 6.0 3.66592920354 164% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.70907079646 37% => OK
Total topic words: 12.0 13.5995575221 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.