The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.
Educational institutes play a crucial role in shaping students' academic path. In realm of education, there has been a debate going on the method which is best way to teach students. Some might agree with the statement that the best way to teach is by ignoring the negative action while parsing positive one, but I do not agree with it. According to me a balance should be maintain between praising positive actions and ignoring negative one. In this essay I would put forth different points to validate my view.
Education is the birthright of all human beings, irrespective of their gender, race, and culture. Educators are mere facilitators which imparts knowledge. Educator or teacher plays a role is very important as it directly affects the students. They should be patient with their students and should praise positive actions of their students. This will help the students to increase their self-confidence and morale. It would also increase the participation of students during the lectures. For instance, if a student is good at drawing, then, the teacher should praise the student, and this would motivate the student to improve and make the next painting with more hard work and determination.
Praising helps in improving the behaviour of the students and concentration. By praising, the student would feel happy and satisfied that his work is being recognize. This helps the students to work more diligently and passionately in their next assignment. For instance, if a student is submitting his assignment always on time and the teacher praises him, then this would be a proof that his effort has not gone to vain and it would also motivate him to maintain this perfect record of timely submission.
However, just by praising positive action and ignoring the negative one would not be advantageous. The teacher should punish the students who shows negative actions as this helps them set an example for the student, that wrong doing would not be tolerated. Let us say that a student always disturbs the class and answers questions when it is not his or her chance, then the teacher should not ignore this. Teacher should make the student understand that it is not right to speak in between and take turn of others.
In conclusion, I would like to say that having an amalgamation of praising positive actions and not ignoring negative ones would be the one of the best-way to teach. This would create a perfect balance in the class and would benefit the students most.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 152, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'is the best'.
Suggestion: is the best
...been a debate going on the method which is best way to teach students. Some might agree...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 337, Rule ID: ACCORDING_TO_ME[1]
Message: This phrase can sound awkward in English. Consider using 'in my opinion' or 'I think'.
Suggestion: In my opinion; I think
...sitive one, but I do not agree with it. According to me a balance should be maintain between pr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 373, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'maintained'?
Suggestion: maintained
...it. According to me a balance should be maintain between praising positive actions and i...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 693, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... with more hard work and determination. Praising helps in improving the behaviou...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, then, while, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 12.4196629213 169% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 33.0505617978 127% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2072.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 417.0 442.535393258 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96882494005 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5189133491 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68387645793 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.47242206235 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 621.0 704.065955056 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.9558655099 60.3974514979 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.1818181818 118.986275619 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9545454545 23.4991977007 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.09090909091 5.21951772744 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.2758426966 165% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30779920741 0.243740707755 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108385497969 0.0831039109588 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.171972575323 0.0758088955206 227% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.235996871068 0.150359130593 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.181160787263 0.0667264976115 271% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 48.8420337079 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 100.480337079 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.