The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.
I agree with the statement, "The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones". In order to teach a student effectively, the student must be eager to learn from their teacher. And to create this teaching and learning environment, a teacher cannot always point out the negative deeds and actions of the student. Pointing only negative ones embarrass the students which ultimately make them less receptive during the teaching.
Primarily, we should always remember that human beings are psychological beings and are affected hugely by how others treat them. Everyone loves to be laudable. And to teach anyone means, the student must be willing to give his time and listen to what his or her teacher has to say. The more keenly the student listens to his or her teacher, the effective the teaching can be. One cannot simply force a student to listen and learn. Today's modern teaching technique, Montessori, is entirely based on how we encourage a student to learn by praising unique abilities each student has.
Moreover, the world is changed and the traditional style of teaching students by punishing them has also overturned. In modern approach of teaching, the tutor creates a homely environment for his or her pupil and makes them interactive. More interactive the students or pupils are better the teaching can be. This does not entirely mean a teacher should always neglect the negative deeds of their students. In that case, they should counsel their students with love and affection. They might have done some meager mistakes and for that they should not be treated as a criminal. Already the teaching institutions around the globe has implemented this approach to teach their students.
As a conclusion, the statement aforementioned is so true that almost every responsible stake holders advocate in its support and governments around the globe has institutionalized it with correct policies. UNESCO has published several articles endorsing such claims.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, moreover, so, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 58.6224719101 58% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1687.0 2235.4752809 75% => OK
No of words: 323.0 442.535393258 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22291021672 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77961684071 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 215.323595506 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.560371517028 0.4932671777 114% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 704.065955056 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.6528096166 60.3974514979 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.7894736842 118.986275619 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 23.4991977007 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.31578947368 5.21951772744 25% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1974867066 0.243740707755 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0631361382697 0.0831039109588 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11094482451 0.0758088955206 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118963831504 0.150359130593 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.126806945854 0.0667264976115 190% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.7 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 100.480337079 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.