The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.
Teaching is considered as one of the most crucial activities for an individual and thus one's actions define the type of teaching he has been through. The statement given states that praising positive actions over negative actions is the best way to teach, but that might not be a fruitfull way to teach someone.
Teaching techniques vary from individual to individual and thus there need not be the best way around it. Considering the statement, praising one's positive actions is a good way to introduce someone to what is good and might in turn help the person to grow and perpetually spread the cheerful vibes to others. In this way one knows what actions he has to perform and in what manner to get appreciation or rewards. This can be related to the scenario when a parent tells his kid that santa will bring you presents if you are good to others.
But there is a downside to this path of training. If he or she, say does not know what egregious actions are and what those actions might result into then the entire point of teaching is futile. Ignoring one's negative actions results in them performing such actions more and more without anyone stoping them and teaching them the correct way. Such a teaching might turn one's career into a total disaster where the person does not know if he is performing good or bad actions. Parents should also tell their kids what santa might do if they do not obey.
The best way to teach a machine is making the use of machine learning. Where an agent is placed in an environment where it needs to solve a particular task. The agent itself learns through reinforcement learning where it is rewarded on a step closer and penalized on a step away from the solution. This approach results in teaching the agent to behoove in the manner that is best for it.
The best way to teach, thus, should be where praising positive actions accompanies punishment on negative ones. This helps one to recognize what is good or bad for oneself. Such a teaching can be a true teaching where one learns a true lesson and makes something out of learning.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 205, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...e point of teaching is futile. Ignoring ones negative actions results in them perfor...
^^^^
Line 3, column 371, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...correct way. Such a teaching might turn ones career into a total disaster where the ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 35, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...bey. The best way to teach a machine is making the use of machine learning. Wher...
^^
Line 4, column 72, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Where” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...is making the use of machine learning. Where an agent is placed in an environment wh...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, then, thus, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 58.6224719101 73% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1710.0 2235.4752809 76% => OK
No of words: 372.0 442.535393258 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.59677419355 5.05705443957 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45554032476 2.79657885939 88% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 215.323595506 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.451612903226 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 523.8 704.065955056 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.4701262967 60.3974514979 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.0 118.986275619 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 23.4991977007 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.21951772744 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.40759608314 0.243740707755 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134730930778 0.0831039109588 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.164327903803 0.0758088955206 217% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.253661532578 0.150359130593 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.115357665303 0.0667264976115 173% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 14.1392134831 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 48.8420337079 139% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.1743820225 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.4 12.1639044944 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 100.480337079 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.