The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.
Teaching is considered one of the most prominent professions. Teaching builds the foundation of the individual, how that individual is going to perceive the world and stimulate to the surrounding, how the individual is going to interact with the fellow beings. Teaching is considered merely a profession but if we look at a bigger picture, it is much more than that. There are numerous ways of teaching opted by teachers, some take lenient road, while other opt for the strict manners of teaching. The speaker claims that best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore the negative ones. I strongly disagree with this assertion. Thereby, in the following paragraphs, I present few compelling arguments to bolster the stand taken.
While it may be tempting to concede that praising the positive actions imparts more optimism around in the atmosphere but, however, ignoring the negative actions seems to be indefensible. In my opinion, negative actions must be acknowledged with an admonish remark so that the actor gets to know that such actions are not acceptable. Ignoring the negative actions may lead to development of unexpected traits among individuals which may be acceptable to the society.
Adding further credibility to the stand taken, if the negative actions are ignored in the very nascent stage, thus we give those actions a chance to develop into traits. In a scenario where an individual possesses/performs more negative actions than positive actions, in this case we cannot go on ignoring those negative actions. At some point we would have to correct the individual by acknowledging the negative actions. Thus negative actions should be dealt with in the very beginning stages.
However, if the individual is a sensitive person, then the approach suggested in the assertion must be opted. Keeping in mind the sensitive nature of the person, negative actions must have a strong reason. Thus instead of acknowledging the negative actions, the reason should be looked for.
To sum up, I would like to add that keeping aside the later scenario, the negative actions of an individual must be dealt with in proper time, other it may be too late if we decide to act upon them in later stages where those may become difficult to get rid of.
- Technology, while apparently aimed to simplify our lives, only makes our lives more complicated. 58
- the society must prepare its younger generation for leadership in various sectors of the nations by instilling in them with the sense of cooperation rather than competition. 54
- Society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. 58
- Some people believe that college students should consider only their own talents and interests when choosing a field of study. Others believe that college students should base their choice of a field of study on the availability of jobs in that field. 58
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 262, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ing to interact with the fellow beings. Teaching is considered merely a profession but i...
Line 3, column 247, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ative actions must be acknowledged with an admonish remark so that the actor gets to know t...
Line 8, column 263, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
...ose may become difficult to get rid of.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, may, so, then, thus, while, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 14.8657303371 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1899.0 2235.4752809 85% => OK
No of words: 375.0 442.535393258 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.064 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40055868397 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81606313061 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 215.323595506 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.514666666667 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 603.0 704.065955056 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.1697723463 60.3974514979 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.5 118.986275619 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8333333333 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.22222222222 5.21951772744 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 5.13820224719 234% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.386085698961 0.243740707755 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13210911314 0.0831039109588 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.183738085041 0.0758088955206 242% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196017777446 0.150359130593 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109750838666 0.0667264976115 164% => OK
automated_readability_index: 12.8 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 100.480337079 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.