The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Teaching is a process of transferring knowledge from one person to another, often it is mentioned to be harder than learning something. The prompt mentions the best method to teach is to praise positive actions rather than ignore negative ones. In my opinion, I moderately agree with this suggestion and argue that to some extent this suggestion is positive for three reasons.
Firstly, as student confidence often matters to some extent, it is preferred to have a positive appraisal which in turn boosts the confidence of the student, For instance, if a person with lower confidence tries to do some work, it would most probably lead to failure as the person would be doubtful in everything and always be rechecking his work leading to waste time, also keep stressing out which lead to even more loss of confidence, so having positive appraisal would mostly likely increase the productivity and learning of a student.
Secondly, sometimes too many positive complements could lead to overconfidence, as the person would become less concerned about learning, For instance, a human brain is most often driven by hardship and interest, so having more positive appraisals would make the person assume that anything could be learned with ease leading decrease both interest and hardship, these could increase to a point where the person will not attempt to learn anything. However, some amount of positive appraisal is good but too much could lead to problems.
Lastly, some people take appraisals seriously both positive and negative ones, so teachers should take some kind of precautionary steps to make students believe in themselves and not be carried away too much with it, For instance, a person who takes negative appraisals into consideration for improvement rather than taking it personally would increase curiosity but those other persons would get lose interest in the respective subject, these kinds of extreme persons could be taken care by the student by keeping a keen eye on students performance and constantly assessing it, although this may be impossible sometimes in such conditions, Teachers should avoid giving negative appraisals and stick with positive ones.
Of course, some argue that just giving positive appraisals are the way to go, but it could lead to many problems which are mentioned above. Finally, the best way to tackle this statement is to always maintain some kind of balance between the negative and positive appraisals and not rely on one too much.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...roductivity and learning of a student. Secondly, sometimes too many positive co...
^^^^
Line 7, column 531, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...by the student by keeping a keen eye on students performance and constantly assessing it...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, lastly, may, second, secondly, so, for instance, kind of, of course, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2098.0 2235.4752809 94% => OK
No of words: 403.0 442.535393258 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20595533499 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48049772903 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71187387686 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 215.323595506 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508684863524 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 658.8 704.065955056 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 20.2370786517 44% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 44.0 23.0359550562 191% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 218.918610503 60.3974514979 362% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 233.111111111 118.986275619 196% => OK
Words per sentence: 44.7777777778 23.4991977007 191% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.5555555556 5.21951772744 279% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18602324422 0.243740707755 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103315373805 0.0831039109588 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0509425347402 0.0758088955206 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12593496877 0.150359130593 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0499800663052 0.0667264976115 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 25.5 14.1392134831 180% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.82 48.8420337079 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 20.5 12.1743820225 168% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.83 12.1639044944 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.38706741573 111% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 100.480337079 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.8971910112 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 19.6 11.2143820225 175% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.