The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Life is a rollercoaster ride in the sense that everyone in their lifetime experiences things on both sides of the coin. No person, by birth , is carved out as a perfect individual. Everyone makes mistakes and they need to be corrected. While praising positive actions boosts morale, I mostly believe the best way to teach is not to praise only positive actions by ignoring negative ones for two reasons.
To begin, ignoring negative actions while teaching will never make the other a better person. You only grow by continuous learning and upskilling in the right direction. Identifying mistakes is always an integral part of learning. A best teacher should always identify the negatives/ weaknesses of a person and must constantly work in order to communicate ways to overcome them. For example, take the case of an Olympic badminton player training to win a medal for his country. During his practice, the coach must definitely identify the weakness of the player , say backshot smash, and get it trained daily. If he keeps on praising the positive strengths of the player, will a day arise where the player would be basking on his success? The answer is no as the competitor would study him and will thrive on the player’s weakness to vanquish. This example illustrates that one mustn’t ignore the negative ones as it never gives a chance to grow.
Further, does a parent during the early mental development of a child, not teach a lesson to impart wisdom on the wrongdoings of the child? It is always necessary to teach them on their negatives at the most earliest stage as possible , as not doing so will only lead them to get their mind develop towards making them a wicked person. If not mended their brain in the initial stages, it would be very hard on the parents to correct their behavior at a later stage. For example, a child if brought up by only praising on his positive actions, will have uncorrected negative influences surrounding him and it will turn him to the most evil person and may even make him turn as a terrorist/sociopath and attempts to end the society.
Of course, not at all praising on the positive things is also not good for teaching. We all want a sense of recognition for every achievement as this gives a purpose to accomplish more. If not, we feel dejected and may lose zeal to achieve further. Finally, the best way to get corrected is always to be taught by the closed ones as these people are always with the person during his accomplishments and they would be apt enough to teach a lesson on the negative mistakes that happened. In that way there would be great learning and not just the feeling of being pointed at only on negativity.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 140, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...h sides of the coin. No person, by birth , is carved out as a perfect individual. ...
^^
Line 2, column 2, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...noring negative ones for two reasons. To begin, ignoring negative actions whil...
^^^
Line 3, column 232, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: The
...is always an integral part of learning. A best teacher should always identify the...
^
Line 3, column 448, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'winning'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'train' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: winning
...of an Olympic badminton player training to win a medal for his country. During his pra...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 562, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...tely identify the weakness of the player , say backshot smash, and get it trained ...
^^
Line 3, column 754, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...e basking on his success? The answer is no as the competitor would study him and w...
^^
Line 5, column 204, Rule ID: MOST_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use only 'earliest' (without 'most') when you use the superlative.
Suggestion: earliest
...to teach them on their negatives at the most earliest stage as possible , as not doing so wil...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 204, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'most the earliest'.
Suggestion: most the earliest
...to teach them on their negatives at the most earliest stage as possible , as not doing so wil...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 235, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...s at the most earliest stage as possible , as not doing so will only lead them to ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, if, may, so, while, for example, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 58.6224719101 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2221.0 2235.4752809 99% => OK
No of words: 470.0 442.535393258 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72553191489 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65612321451 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69034441276 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 215.323595506 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504255319149 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 690.3 704.065955056 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.9713154607 60.3974514979 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.954545455 118.986275619 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3636363636 23.4991977007 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.59090909091 5.21951772744 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 7.80617977528 115% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 5.13820224719 234% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200437595841 0.243740707755 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.05449724082 0.0831039109588 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0686601331603 0.0758088955206 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129355014725 0.150359130593 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0455612030735 0.0667264976115 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 12.1639044944 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 100.480337079 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.