The best way to understand the character of a society is to examine the character of the men and women that the society chooses as its heroes or its role models.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
society comprises of people belonging to the same or different communities gathered together to mingle as one family for diverse purposes. Every society chooses its leader for the effective organisation. Some societies choose their leader based on elections. I partially agree to the given issue since leaders are chosen only by majority voting. So a society's head need not symbolise the character of the people belonging to it.
When we consider the Indian society as a whole, people of diverse caste, creed, language and sect can be found. While choosing a proper leader for the nation, people in northern part of the country voted for the ruling party whereas people belonging to the southern part voted for the opposition party. Using this fact, it cannot be concluded that the character of the leader personifies the character of the people in the society.
A role model or a hero can only act as a mediator for fulfilling the needs of an individual which is not permanent. Also, for a person holding a high position in the society, there is a greater chance for him/ her to betray the people for the sake of money. Moreover, they might become corrupt. In such a case, it is not logically relevant to decide the character of people based on their role models or heroes. Thus
, it can be concluded that, the character of an individual is bound to change depending on the environment and his position. deciding the character based on a leader is not relevant. At the same time, it is a foolish act.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Society
society comprises of people belonging to the sa...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 9, Rule ID: COMPRISES_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comprises' or 'consists of'?
Suggestion: comprises; consists of
society comprises of people belonging to the same or differe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 430, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...haracter of the people belonging to it. When we consider the Indian society as a...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 433, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...character of the people in the society. A role model or a hero can only act as a...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 417, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sed on their role models or heroes. Thus , it can be concluded that, the characte...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...n their role models or heroes. Thus , it can be concluded that, the character...
^
Line 7, column 126, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Deciding
...ng on the environment and his position. deciding the character based on a leader is not ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, moreover, so, thus, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 14.8657303371 34% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 33.0505617978 51% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 58.6224719101 51% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1252.0 2235.4752809 56% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 261.0 442.535393258 59% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7969348659 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.55969084622 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63144065588 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 215.323595506 67% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.4932671777 113% => OK
syllable_count: 406.8 704.065955056 58% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.7496068858 60.3974514979 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.4666666667 118.986275619 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4 23.4991977007 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.93333333333 5.21951772744 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166842722124 0.243740707755 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0664155880442 0.0831039109588 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0578213874679 0.0758088955206 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102735477012 0.150359130593 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0520149684911 0.0667264976115 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 14.1392134831 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.26 12.1639044944 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 100.480337079 60% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.