In business, education, and government, it is always appropriate to remain skeptical of new leaders until those leaders show that they are worthy of trust.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
The prompt urges to remain skeptical in the field of business, education and governement until the leader are proved to worthy of trust. For some obvious reasons I would like to be "mostly agree" with the given concept and therefore obliged to provide necessary viewpoints in defense of my position.
To flourish in the filed of business, education and legislation - it is always important to choose the leaders very appropriately. It is most often recommended to select leaders through a long-term evaluation process and judge them before they are given the authority. Being skeptical towards a leader in most cases help the leader to remain survilient in his jobs. When the mass people of a nation remains skeptical and doubtful for a certain period time time until the leader is given the authority to lead - the leadeer becomes quite enthusiastic in his duties to fulfill those properly. He knows that he has not been an established leader yet and can be propelled by his competitors at about any time when his fellow people are suspecious of him. As a result, he will try his level best to please the simple person through his good works, benevolence activities and altruistic approaches and will continue to try until he is proven to be worthy of. Apart from this - because of this vulnerability, the leaders also do not take the leadership position for granted and works hard to prove their worth. Consequently, people can see how much their potential leaders can endure, what is their level of patience and how occassionally they solve critical problems and so on. They can get the better view of the potential leader and in return it helps them to chose a more prominent one for the role.
Another important factor is that - because future leaders will try their level best to please their fellow people, remaining skeptical of their abilities - then there happend to be a good competition among the potential leaders. The future leaders will go through different levels of trials and series of activites to prove their worth and these will only make them more prepare for the their role. They will be more matured and more learned than they would be if they were no to allowed to prove their worth. Apart from this also, when a leader earned his position through levels of hard works and trials then generally he would take more prestige in his works and respects his position of being a "leader" in his respective sectors. On the other hand - a leadewho has not been put into any trial or has not been asserted to do any certain tasks to prove his worth - will take the position for granted and as a result will not value his position. This will bring the downfall of the field the individual will lead and ultimately he will proved to be poor one to lead the groups. Nevertheless, there will always be some individuals who are born to lead, however, exceptions can not be examples and that is why it is always recommended to take the leaders on a trial to prove his worth in front of his fellow groups and thereby making justice to his leadership role.
Counter point view could be that - people should not be remain skeptical towards their leader and should trust them wholeheartedly once they have proved their worth. The point is absolutely fine and people should be careful of it. It is because when a leader is proved to lead a certain group of people, by then he should have earned the respect and trust of the people; without which no matter how efficient and benevolent a leader is , he can not prosper and can not make his field to flourish. Mutual trust and respect between leaders and fellow people is so important that without any of these too, no matter how good another one is - the ultimate outcome will be far less than it should be. That is why, when a leader is proven and should be free to avail his position then there should be no mistrust and skepticism from the followers towards their leaders. Also, the fact that - being skeptical above a certain level will hurt the sincerety of the leaders and will demotivate him to work for the betterment of his people. As a result, he will loose the enthusiasm he had firstly to serve his respective field adn in reuturn he will get the toxicity of his beloved people. This will make the relationship of the leaders-followers very poor and ultimately take the field to the dogs, even though the leaders are of high caliber and great potential.
So, looking at all the points mentioned above it is by far recommended to remain skeptical about the abilities of the leaders for a certain period of time until their worthness are proved and then the leaders should be allowed to lead, without any further mistrust and skepticism, as it will help the fellow groups and people to learn their leaders more and thus to collaborate with them, resulting a more properous prospect for the future in that respective field.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 63, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed of business education and legislation it is always important to choose the lea...
^^
Line 3, column 146, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'recommended selecting'.
Suggestion: recommended selecting
...ers very appropriately It is most often recommended to select leaders through a longterm evaluation p...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 446, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: time
...tical and doubtful for a certain period time time until the leader is given the authority...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 503, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he leader is given the authority to lead the leadeer becomes quite enthusiastic i...
^^
Line 3, column 957, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s proven to be worthy of Apart from this because of this vulnerability the leader...
^^
Line 3, column 1378, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... chose a more prominent one for the role Another important factor is that becaus...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 33, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ole Another important factor is that because future leaders will try their le...
^^
Line 5, column 152, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e remaining skeptical of their abilities then there happend to be a good competit...
^^
Line 5, column 380, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'their'?
Suggestion: the; their
...se will only make them more prepare for the their role They will be more matured and more...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 470, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...learned than they would be if they were no to allowed to prove their worth Apart f...
^^
Line 5, column 691, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...orks and respects his position of being a aposleaderapos in his respective sector...
^
Line 5, column 751, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...his respective sectors On the other hand a leadewho has not been put into any tri...
^^
Line 5, column 863, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... do any certain tasks to prove his worth will take the position for granted and a...
^^
Line 5, column 1034, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'prove'
Suggestion: prove
...vidual will lead and ultimately he will proved to be poor one to lead the groups Never...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1215, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'recommended taking'.
Suggestion: recommended taking
...e examples and that is why it is always recommended to take the leaders on a trial to prove his wor...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 33, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...role Counter point view could be that people should not be remain skeptical to...
^^
Line 7, column 226, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: it
...ly fine and people should be careful of it It is because when a leader is proved to l...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 431, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...how efficient and benevolent a leader is he can not prosper and can not make his ...
^^
Line 7, column 629, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...se too no matter how good another one is the ultimate outcome will be far less th...
^^
Line 7, column 871, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...towards their leaders Also the fact that being skeptical above a certain level wi...
^^
Line 7, column 1035, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[4]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
...rment of his people As a result he will loose the enthusiasm he had firstly to serve ...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 59, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'recommended remaining'.
Suggestion: recommended remaining
...the points mentioned above it is by far recommended to remain skeptical about the abilities of the le...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 140, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... abilities of the leaders for a certain period of time until their worthness are proved and th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, look, nevertheless, so, then, therefore, thus, apart from, as a result, in most cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 47.0 19.5258426966 241% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 38.0 12.4196629213 306% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 39.0 14.8657303371 262% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 86.0 33.0505617978 260% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 110.0 58.6224719101 188% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3982.0 2235.4752809 178% => OK
No of words: 855.0 442.535393258 193% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.65730994152 5.05705443957 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.40743775132 4.55969084622 119% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50130406124 2.79657885939 89% => OK
Unique words: 292.0 215.323595506 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.341520467836 0.4932671777 69% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1246.5 704.065955056 177% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 6.24550561798 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 20.2370786517 5% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 855.0 23.0359550562 3712% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 60.3974514979 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 3982.0 118.986275619 3347% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 855.0 23.4991977007 3638% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 153.0 5.21951772744 2931% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 23.0 7.80617977528 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 10.2758426966 10% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169063372037 0.243740707755 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.169063372037 0.0831039109588 203% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0758088955206 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136987151906 0.150359130593 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0464245418762 0.0667264976115 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 428.0 14.1392134831 3027% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -787.89 48.8420337079 -1613% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.92365168539 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 335.6 12.1743820225 2757% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 11.23 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 48.37 8.38706741573 577% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 126.0 100.480337079 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 61.0 11.8971910112 513% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 344.0 11.2143820225 3067% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 61.0 11.7820224719 518% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.