Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader it is not as important as a leader s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree wi

Essay topics:

Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader, it is not as important as a leader’s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.

It is, well, has been a preferred way of serving for many leaders by letting their followers or peers suger-coated. However, to rise into an effetive leadership - a leader better stuck to his or her moral principles in ways of complementing his or her works. In response to my opinion I would like to be "mostly disagree" with priompt's recommendation to earn the respect of peers rather than following one's moral judgements for following two reasons.

Initially, in open eyes it is always great to be everyone's favourite list for a leader. But to be an effective leader one can should posses high moral values. This is so important because in the reign of one's leadership there may come times when a leader has to stand by his principles to serve the truth rather than earning ephimeral gratitude from his peers. For instance - if a leader punishes a person, who has suffered jealousy and violence from his countrymen for his straightcut and simple manner, without any evidence for his guilt but only to earn applause from his fellow men, then in no case we can call him a great leader. It is because he has already broken the first and fundamental principle of a leader by commiting an criminal action, that is to say - showing proper guidance to the follower.

Another thing is that - normally people choose a leader based on an individual's merit on leading the group who can foresee the future and work accordingly. According to that definition the followers of a leader may not share equal wisedom or judgement on a matter as of a leader. Now if a leader follows his prime men blindly then it might take his as well as downfall for his group. Morever, if we look out for statistics we can easily spot out that leader who have been biased to certain groups had rumenerated by a great loss.

Although it might not always be a contradictory idea that to have a strong moral judgement as well as great respect from peers is an impossible characterstics to have to be an effective leader, however, comparing these two my vote will always go for the prime one.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 205, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...is so important because in the reign of ones leadership there may come times when a ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 733, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ntal principle of a leader by commiting an criminal action, that is to say - showi...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, first, however, if, look, may, so, then, well, another thing, as to, for instance, as well as, that is to say

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 58.6224719101 78% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1710.0 2235.4752809 76% => OK
No of words: 364.0 442.535393258 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.6978021978 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77958714176 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 215.323595506 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546703296703 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 537.3 704.065955056 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 23.0359550562 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.595076645 60.3974514979 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.538461538 118.986275619 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0 23.4991977007 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.76923076923 5.21951772744 187% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253444194211 0.243740707755 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10191615526 0.0831039109588 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0449839299621 0.0758088955206 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165498697497 0.150359130593 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0215748180766 0.0667264976115 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 14.1392134831 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.28 12.1639044944 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 100.480337079 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 11.2143820225 118% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.


Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.