An ailing patient should have easy access to his or her doctor’s record of treating similarly afflicted patients. Through gaining such access, the ailing patient may better determine whether the doctor is competent to treat that medical condition.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
The prompt supports the idea that an ailing patient should have easy access to his or her doctor's record of treating similarly afflicted patients in order to a better idea whether the doctor is competent enough to treat him or her. For some obvious reasons I would like to be "disagree". Hereby, I am obliged to elaborate some points in defense of my position.
To begin with - before asking if the idea is good or bad that a patient shoould have an easy access to his or her doctor's documents or records of patients, we need to be clear about the significance of this to the doctor-patient relationship. It is very evident from our daily lives that people people hardly go to a doctor by checking his previous records. In most cases, people find their comfort zone among the doctors who have good behavour and are modest to their patients. However, that does not mean that we can ignroe all the qualities with the frankness of a doctor towards his patients. What happens is that - the reputation of a doctor plays a huge role in determining one over another for the patients to be treated. Sometimes the record does not tell the whole story and hide the true capabilities of a doctor. Suppose, it is found in the record of one of the doctors that about 60% of the people; inflicted of myopia, have been treated well and are living in good shape. But is there any surety that the records are not biased or are not manipulated.
Morever, for instance- if doctor A's record says that his success rate is 80% compared to doctor B whose success rate is 95%. From this record it can easily be said that doctor B is much more capable in handling patient than doctor B. Howver, if that is so - then we are actually missing a point here. Let be cleared of this. Now what if it is found out later that the success rate calculated for doctor A is out of one thousand plus patients and on the other-hand the same of doctor B is out of merely over 200 patients. If the scenarios are such then we riun into problem, that is to say - we will not get clear understanding of the competence of the doctors rather we might misjudge. If this type of records; which are not properly maintained or cleared of any assumptions - been given easy access to potential patients, then these might bias them and in return they stand poor chance to judge their doctors properly.
Apart from that - if the patients are provided with easy access to the records of their doctors deeds, then in not so rare cases, it might cause forgeries to happen. Even, many ill-willed persons, in disguise of patients may harm change into those records in order to harm the reputation of the respective doctors. Also, giving easy access of the records make the data avaliable there to be misinterpreted; sometimes severe misconceptions or rumors are charged with the death of dire patients beause of taking wrong decisiopns based on those poorly interpreted data available to the patients.
So, looking at all the factors and logical reasoning provided, it might not be a bad idea to state that - patients are not to be allowed to have easy access to the records of their doctors unless those data are properly interpreted to them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 86, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'easy access'.
Suggestion: easy access
...good or bad that a patient shoould have an easy access to his or her doctors documents or reco...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 289, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: people
... very evident from our daily lives that people people hardly go to a doctor by checking his p...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, however, if, look, may, similarly, so, then, well, apart from, for instance, in most cases, to begin with, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 35.0 19.5258426966 179% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 56.0 33.0505617978 169% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 84.0 58.6224719101 143% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2630.0 2235.4752809 118% => OK
No of words: 569.0 442.535393258 129% => OK
Chars per words: 4.62214411248 5.05705443957 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.88402711743 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61710443599 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 265.0 215.323595506 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.465729349736 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 822.6 704.065955056 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.9660701061 60.3974514979 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.545454545 118.986275619 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8636363636 23.4991977007 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.45454545455 5.21951772744 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.413336391492 0.243740707755 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114854752915 0.0831039109588 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.129677970581 0.0758088955206 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.252998377056 0.150359130593 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100180920132 0.0667264976115 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 14.1392134831 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 48.8420337079 129% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 12.1639044944 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 100.480337079 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.