Leaders are created by the demands that are placed on them Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporting your position y

Essay topics:

Leaders are created by the demands that are placed on them.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.

The prompt urges that the demand of contremporaries will create a leader out of an individual. For some obvious reasons I would like to be "mostly agree" with the concept and hereby I am obliged to provide necessary elaborations of both the proponent and oponent views of the statement in defense of my position.

The proponent viewpoint of the concept is - leaders in most cases are made out of the urgency of contemporary things. One of the biggest reason behind this might be the ability to think out of the box. A leader should have a good subtle understanding of things and has to have the ability to think out of the box. Arguebly, a leader can not be like the others. He or she should have the ability to lead a group of people, should have the ability to take better decision in dilemma as well as has to think advancedly than others. When the contemporary demands are placed before the group of people; any of whom are the potential leader - they have to do things that will meet the demands. Most possibly all the people will follow more or less similar strategy to meet that demand. Some of them might panic and some of them might not understand the problem at all. Even amongst them, there will be some people will show discreet ability to judge the problem. Those people will ask each and every assumptions behind the problem and will try answer of those questions by them helping unasnwered ones to solve. Many of them will show acumen in the plausible solutions of the demand or how it can be achieved and so on. These people are the geuine candidate of a leadership. Luckily, only a few of them will stand out from the crowd showing their worth by thinking out of the box for the same demand. This is how a leader can be made out of many people and hence conducting demand before the potential leaders might be one of the most efficient way to discern one from the normies.

The opponent viewpoint of this proposal is that - placing demands irrespective of the candidates might not help to create a leader. The definition of a leader based on - the ability of an individual to lead a group a people. This definition might not sufficiently disregard the ability of a leader to solve any type of problem, however, it is highly unlikely for a person to gain all the necessary knowledge to solve any problems or demand placed on them. Well, in this prospect, will a person who is probably more knowledgable and assiduous in solving any demand placed on them, can defeat another one, having quite good management skills and knows how to run a group of people, nevertheless, less acumen than the earlier one? Probably not. If thus so, then probably all the scientists, teachers or researchers would likely to be the presidents or leaders of their respective countries. So, that is not the case. To be a leader one does not have to be very good at everything or be very efficient in solving any problem or demand. Rather the leadership quality of a person can be judged based on the decision he or she made under the circumstances. So, placing contemporary demands to choose a leader out of people might belie the true concept of leadership.

A good alternative viewpoint could be that - not just mere placing of problems or demand before a leader, but to judge the ability of the individual to disseminate those among his or her fellow people will reflect the true worth of him or her. A true leader knows how to do work by the people by convincing them; arguebly not overpowering them neither being sanctimonious towards them - rather being adroit in disparaging and highlighting certain points by which he can help his persons to do the work completely. The leader can prove his worth in this way more genuinely rather than merely doing all the works or by solving the problem by himself.

So, looking at all the views presented above it can be argued that - the best possible way to discern and create a leader is not only by just placing some problems before him to solve rather by judging his merit - while maintaining proper balance in the way how he gets the work done.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 889, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[4]
Message: “So , that” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... leaders of their respective countries. So, that is not the case. To be a leader one doe...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1033, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Rather,
...cient in solving any problem or demand. Rather the leadership quality of a person can ...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, look, nevertheless, so, then, thus, well, while, as to, as well as, in most cases, more or less

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 32.0 12.4196629213 258% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 26.0 14.8657303371 175% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 52.0 33.0505617978 157% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 110.0 58.6224719101 188% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3371.0 2235.4752809 151% => OK
No of words: 730.0 442.535393258 165% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.61780821918 5.05705443957 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.19793345208 4.55969084622 114% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61560192835 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 287.0 215.323595506 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.393150684932 0.4932671777 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1063.8 704.065955056 151% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.2370786517 143% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.4701749363 60.3974514979 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.24137931 118.986275619 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1724137931 23.4991977007 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.13793103448 5.21951772744 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 10.2758426966 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119760916098 0.243740707755 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0384934213892 0.0831039109588 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0271744110192 0.0758088955206 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.080476786844 0.150359130593 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0246015724895 0.0667264976115 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 48.8420337079 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 12.1639044944 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 100.480337079 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.