Claim: Any piece of information referred to as a fact should be mistrusted, since it may well be proven false in the future.
Reason: Much of the information that people assume is factual actually turns out to be inaccurate.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
The prompt urges that information regarded as "fact" should be proscribed in terms of trust issues as much of those information assumed by people actually turn out to be inaccurate. For some obvious reasons I would like to be "mostly disagree" with the given concept and therefore obliged to provide necessary elaboration of certain viewpoints in defense of my position.
The very term "fact" is thought to be an in general occurance in day to day life or sometimes as a certain something, might not have any validity, nevertheless, pretty common in human livelihood. It might not be a necessary characteristics of a "fact" to prove its validity. It is because the thing that is widely prevailed in human society or in least result of numerous observation, may not have attained any concrete reasoning from human, nevertheless, its devaluation is near to impossible. For example - we know that death is something that is common to all. Each and every person who has lived will succumb death - just earlier or later. In reality people do have know the reason behind happening of death; such as - degradation of human cells, suffer from various diseases and so on. People have been able to find out the reason and cause behind death by the virtue of science or technology. But what if they could not or what if the modern science has not been evolved into this stage to sort out the function of death? Will then death be uncommon to all or will it be chosen among the people? The death is a fact and it will continue to occur at any stage of human lives irrespect of whether humans have sorted out the mystery or not. Similarly the fact is kind of known truth that might not have the validation that the contemporary era demands however, also could not prove its devaluation; can only provide with necessary reasoning.
The reasoning of the statement primes that - much of the information considered to be facts are assumed and that is why are turned out to be inaccurate. In many options it is correct. But this viewpoints has successfully neglected the precious portion of the very issue. That is the human observation. It is not an upheaval task to understand that human are servant of speculation. They tend to believe what they see or they can perceive. Since their ancestors human beings had assumed many things and based on their assumptions they had silved many problems; modern science is the upshot of those earlier solutions. In that hard times they might not have the concrete hypothesis or reasoning to guard their assumptions, however, they did not have any ways to falsify those assumptions too. As they did not have plethora of options to do things in other ways, they had to follow their assumptions and in return they had bestowed the human history with riches. Now, if all of their assumptions were turned out to be inaccurate then the human beings might have live in dystopian society! - that is not actually. History evidents that people have conjectured and they did those quite successfully and if we look at the very much decisive and risk taking decision that made the today's world, are much indebted to scrupulous and meticulous observations of efficient human assumptions. Moreover, if human being knows the logic behind each and every dilemma or predicaments then they would not have assumed and there will be no chance of origination of facts - which is quite impossible to happen as human beings are not the omniscent.
The idea of inaccuracy in a given fact can not ignored in full fledged either. To judge a fact for its authenticity one has to dig up to its frequency and proper observation. If neither of these characterstics are convinient enough to convince that individual to pressume then that incidence can not be regarded as facts. Facts are only those which have evloved becaus of the virute of solid observation with high frequency in nature. So, if any one these properties are compensated then an incident can not be described as fact. This type of problem will occur when human beings tend to over-simplify things. They try hard to persist that incidence towards their propensity and want to get result precipiteously. When the hastyness occurs the judgement is compromised and as a result sometimes result in false facts. However, majority of the cases regarding facts are well-observed as people normally has pretty close relation to these. Human beings are the direct ones who are largely related to these facts and that is why these facts have largely been suucumb to a great number of individual speculations; reducing its chances of non-uniformity.
So, looking at the points and factors made in the essay - the prompt's idea can be outmoded by the fact that most of the "facts" posses accuracy, nevertheless, there were arrival of some psedu-facts, which in reality are not facts at all.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-12 | HAN YEBIN | 50 | view |
| 2023-09-21 | Dipesh1234 | 66 | view |
| 2023-09-05 | wopona8219 | 66 | view |
| 2023-08-30 | Kamnele | 33 | view |
| 2023-08-18 | IshaanN | 50 | view |
- Claim Knowing about the past cannot help people to make important decisions today Reason We are not able to make connections between current events and past events until we have some distance from both Write a response in which you discuss the extent to w 66
- The following recommendation appeared in a memo from the mayor of the town of Hopewell Two years ago the nearby town of Ocean View built a new municipal golf course and resort hotel During the past two years tourism in Ocean View has increased new busines 68
- Educators should teach facts only after their students have studied the ideas trends and concepts that help explain those facts Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reason 66
- Men and women are not equially suitable for the same tasks because of their inherent physical differences 66
- People who are the most deeply committed to an idea or policy are also the most critical of it Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In devel 58
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 121, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this information' or 'those informations'?
Suggestion: this information; those informations
...bed in terms of trust issues as much of those information assumed by people actually turn out to ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 235, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'characteristic'?
Suggestion: characteristic
...livelihood. It might not be a necessary characteristics of a 'fact' to prove its vali...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 254, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...t not be a necessary characteristics of a 'fact' to prove its validity....
^
Line 3, column 365, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'in the least'.
Suggestion: in the least
...is widely prevailed in human society or in least result of numerous observation, may not...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 691, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'known'.
Suggestion: known
...ier or later. In reality people do have know the reason behind happening of death; s...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1265, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Similarly,
...ans have sorted out the mystery or not. Similarly the fact is kind of known truth that mi...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 189, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ate. In many options it is correct. But this viewpoints has successfully neglected t...
^^^^
Line 7, column 48, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'ignore'
Suggestion: ignore
...a of inaccuracy in a given fact can not ignored in full fledged either. To judge a fact...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 443, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'anyone'?
Suggestion: anyone
...n with high frequency in nature. So, if any one these properties are compensated then a...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 63, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'prompts'' or 'prompt's'?
Suggestion: prompts'; prompt's
...nts and factors made in the essay - the prompts idea can be outmoded by the fact that m...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, however, if, look, may, moreover, nevertheless, regarding, similarly, so, then, therefore, well, as to, for example, in general, kind of, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 49.0 19.5258426966 251% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 23.0 12.4196629213 185% => OK
Conjunction : 31.0 14.8657303371 209% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 26.0 11.3162921348 230% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 67.0 33.0505617978 203% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 117.0 58.6224719101 200% => OK
Nominalization: 26.0 12.9106741573 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 4068.0 2235.4752809 182% => OK
No of words: 824.0 442.535393258 186% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93689320388 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.35774207935 4.55969084622 118% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90238987249 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 355.0 215.323595506 165% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.430825242718 0.4932671777 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1289.7 704.065955056 183% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 36.0 20.2370786517 178% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.9642158282 60.3974514979 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.0 118.986275619 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8888888889 23.4991977007 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.97222222222 5.21951772744 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 7.80617977528 128% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 5.13820224719 234% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.83258426966 248% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272127668619 0.243740707755 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0727669742296 0.0831039109588 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0907007202601 0.0758088955206 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169648374551 0.150359130593 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0605467644463 0.0667264976115 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 14.1392134831 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 180.0 100.480337079 179% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 11.8971910112 139% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 121, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this information' or 'those informations'?
Suggestion: this information; those informations
...bed in terms of trust issues as much of those information assumed by people actually turn out to ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 235, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'characteristic'?
Suggestion: characteristic
...livelihood. It might not be a necessary characteristics of a 'fact' to prove its vali...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 254, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...t not be a necessary characteristics of a 'fact' to prove its validity....
^
Line 3, column 365, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'in the least'.
Suggestion: in the least
...is widely prevailed in human society or in least result of numerous observation, may not...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 691, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'known'.
Suggestion: known
...ier or later. In reality people do have know the reason behind happening of death; s...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1265, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Similarly,
...ans have sorted out the mystery or not. Similarly the fact is kind of known truth that mi...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 189, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ate. In many options it is correct. But this viewpoints has successfully neglected t...
^^^^
Line 7, column 48, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'ignore'
Suggestion: ignore
...a of inaccuracy in a given fact can not ignored in full fledged either. To judge a fact...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 443, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'anyone'?
Suggestion: anyone
...n with high frequency in nature. So, if any one these properties are compensated then a...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 63, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'prompts'' or 'prompt's'?
Suggestion: prompts'; prompt's
...nts and factors made in the essay - the prompts idea can be outmoded by the fact that m...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, however, if, look, may, moreover, nevertheless, regarding, similarly, so, then, therefore, well, as to, for example, in general, kind of, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 49.0 19.5258426966 251% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 23.0 12.4196629213 185% => OK
Conjunction : 31.0 14.8657303371 209% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 26.0 11.3162921348 230% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 67.0 33.0505617978 203% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 117.0 58.6224719101 200% => OK
Nominalization: 26.0 12.9106741573 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 4068.0 2235.4752809 182% => OK
No of words: 824.0 442.535393258 186% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93689320388 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.35774207935 4.55969084622 118% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90238987249 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 355.0 215.323595506 165% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.430825242718 0.4932671777 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1289.7 704.065955056 183% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 36.0 20.2370786517 178% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.9642158282 60.3974514979 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.0 118.986275619 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8888888889 23.4991977007 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.97222222222 5.21951772744 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 7.80617977528 128% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 5.13820224719 234% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.83258426966 248% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272127668619 0.243740707755 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0727669742296 0.0831039109588 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0907007202601 0.0758088955206 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169648374551 0.150359130593 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0605467644463 0.0667264976115 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 14.1392134831 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 180.0 100.480337079 179% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 11.8971910112 139% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.