In business, education, and government, it is always appropriate to remain skeptical of new leaders until those leaders show that they are worthy of trust.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
In every sector of business, education or governments ,success highly depends on the quality of their leader. A good leader can turn any event auspicious whether a contempt leader can exacerbate the condition in every aspect of business, education and even in government. Besides leadership strengthened by experiences and inner talents. Therefore, I mostly agree with the statement that perhaps being skeptical of the duty of a new leader until he/she proves his trustworthiness.
Firstly,a young leader is bereft of experiences to deal with critical cases of politics, or business or in education, where consequences of young leadership can make the sector vulnerable. For example a person who is new in politics but has to deal with an extremely complicated case, where his one wrong move can create a great dilemma among people and in repercussion the total politics may just fail down on that country. But if there is an erudite and experienced leader, who has previous knowledge of handling critical situations, will take a diplomatic move and mitigate the extremiticity of the situation.For this reason, if there is surveillance and suggestions on the young leader’s statements and movement, he can learn from the experienced instructor. And these instructions can help him to learn more about his positions and how to make appropriate decisions regarding the problem That’s why being skeptical of the young leader’s move can make him take mature moves.
Secondly, A new leader can be easily persuaded for wrong doing. For instance, a leader with no experience, oppositions or other company can make him cajoled for malfeasance by harming the company or politics. As a new leader may not understand what eventually seems right may bring a pernicious effect on the future, therefore his every path should not be obeyed. But if a new leader can prove himself as a trustworthy person by taking some radical action and benevolent moves by his leadership and talent, he must be deified.
Though, being skeptical in every move will make the leader more dependent on others and could not flourish all his abilities.Moreover, new leaders show the path of new doings and new thinking. So always questioning the new thinkings can lead to a commonplace leadership which will be monotonous for the followers as well as no good will be served. Bringing changes in leadership patterns can add a new dimension for emphasizing new success. But always maintaining an archaic pattern of leadership can ruin this probability of success. Like, if a new leader always depends on the previous leader paths in solving a case, it may not work out. As time is changing, the process of leadership also needs fresh moves which may not be appreciated by others. For instance, if a new leader wants to impose technology on his company, where the previous people will question the imposing new techniques may prevent the advancement. Therefore, skepticism may hinder success on some level.
So to conclude, A new leader's way should be checked to an extent to prove his passion for the work and provide suggestions to gain the quality for dealing extreme cases, but not extremely questioning in every doings which can hinder new ways of solving problems.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 140, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... leader A good leader can turn any event auspicious whether a contempt leader can...
^^
Line 3, column 35, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ss Firstlya young leader is bereft of experiences to deal with critical cases ...
^^
Line 3, column 295, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...extremely complicated case where his one wrong move can create a great dilemma am...
^^
Line 3, column 542, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...handling critical situations will take a diplomatic move and mitigate the extremi...
^^
Line 3, column 884, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...opriate decisions regarding the problem Thats why being skeptical of the young leader...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 204, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sance by harming the company or politics As a new leader may not understand what ...
^^
Line 7, column 960, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...pticism may hinder success on some level So to conclude A new leaders way should ...
^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 122, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ion for the work and provide suggestions to gain the quality for dealing extreme ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, if, may, moreover, regarding, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, well, as to, for example, for instance, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 30.0 12.4196629213 242% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 24.0 14.8657303371 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 58.6224719101 106% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2662.0 2235.4752809 119% => OK
No of words: 531.0 442.535393258 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0131826742 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.80035803286 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86832225631 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 240.0 215.323595506 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.45197740113 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 837.0 704.065955056 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 6.24550561798 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 20.2370786517 5% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 531.0 23.0359550562 2305% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 60.3974514979 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 2662.0 118.986275619 2237% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 531.0 23.4991977007 2260% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 155.0 5.21951772744 2970% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 10.2758426966 10% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216921301792 0.243740707755 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.216921301792 0.0831039109588 261% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0758088955206 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144078315819 0.150359130593 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0525030275207 0.0667264976115 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 267.7 14.1392134831 1893% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -467.49 48.8420337079 -957% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.92365168539 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 210.4 12.1743820225 1728% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 13.26 12.1639044944 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 33.63 8.38706741573 401% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 123.0 100.480337079 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 59.0 11.8971910112 496% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 214.4 11.2143820225 1912% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 59.0 11.7820224719 501% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.