The author concludes that a piece of information referred to as a fact can be mistrusted and can be proven wrong in the future. Information is a significant indicator of a country's development and progress. Facts play an important role in society and nation, to indicates different elements in them. I am strongly against the author point of view.
First, In historical times, the scientist does an experiment of different field without proper experimental tools and facts. For example, Albert Einstein was written the book in the details fact of the black hole. However, Due to the lack innovation and technology, the book about a black hole was a huge debate regarding books and many critics mock Albert Einstein. After, The innovation and technology flourish the book has a recheck and found that the book contains information and facts all true and producing great information about evolution of the universe.
Secondly, a piece of information can make a huge difference in creating and developing a new experiment and innovations. For example, Thomas Elva Edison only got a piece of information about bulbs but he started making bulb with that piece of information. Having lots of failures and error while making electric bulb. However, his passion and determination in his experiment help to create a bulb. Many people get light at night with his experiment. So a small piece of knowledge makes a huge impact on creating new innovations.
A piece of information has good factors and bad factors also. It is how the people used that information their life. If people use piece of information for a good experiment like the above examples or people using small information to harm others.
Many might argue that information should be just believed on the basis of their authenticity. But the information which they claim to believe today to be right might be proved wrong tomorrow because we are yet to find many things to fully discover nature. So, the term 'authenticity' in the field of science is vague and dynamic. Any information could not be mistrust, instead, they should be scrutinized very properly and their possible utility should be stressed
- Claim: Any piece of information referred to as a fact should be mistrusted, since it may well be proven false in the future.Reason: Much of the information that people assume is factual actually turns out to be inaccurate. 58
- Recently, there have been discussions about ending Grove College's century-old tradition of all-female education by admitting male students into our programs. At a recent faculty meeting, a majority of faculty members voted in favor of coeducation, arguin 43
- The best ideas arise from a passionate interest in commonplace things.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting you 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 183, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'details'' or 'detail's'?
Suggestion: details'; detail's
...rt Einstein was written the book in the details fact of the black hole. However, Due to...
Line 7, column 57, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...mation has good factors and bad factors also. It is how the people used that informa...
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun might seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much might', 'a good deal of might'.
Suggestion: Much might; A good deal of might
...ng small information to harm others. Many might argue that information should be just b...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, then, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 26.0 12.9106741573 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1823.0 2235.4752809 82% => OK
No of words: 358.0 442.535393258 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09217877095 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87103146921 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.54748603352 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 567.9 704.065955056 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.9864489518 60.3974514979 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.8095238095 118.986275619 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0476190476 23.4991977007 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.19047619048 5.21951772744 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.320437289507 0.243740707755 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0880543247237 0.0831039109588 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0995733164756 0.0758088955206 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172176785659 0.150359130593 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.098255730408 0.0667264976115 147% => OK
automated_readability_index: 11.1 14.1392134831 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 100.480337079 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.