The argument is about admitting male students in a Grove college to encourage more students to apply in Grove college. The author states that regarding the local survey eighty per cent of the students responding and wants the student remains all female. The author wants that Grove college only admit female students.
Firstly of all, The author states that in a faculty meeting, a majority of faculty members voted in favour of co-education in the college application for more male students. The writer does not provide the gender of the faculty member. So most of the faculty member were men and they want to admit more male employee. The author states that it will encourage the students to admit the Grove college but the author lacks to provide the evidence of the facilities and education plans that college provides for newly admitted students. The academic curriculum is low and male students do not interest in applying for the course.
Secondly of all, The author states that Grove students of the past and present are against ideas of coeducation. The Students of Grove college want that college only admit female students. All the students of Grove college are female and so agree with female-based education.
Third, the author recommends that for enhancing the morale among students it is best to impede the coeducation in the collage and convincing the alumnae to support the college. The author fails to consider some factors affecting morale among students. It is possible that students do some immoral behaviours out of the collage. The best way of preventing the student from immoral actions is to talk to them and explain some tips about morality and values among students. The author states this plan encourage the alumnae to support the college. The author assumption based on a doubtful proposition. The author overlooks that what encourages the alumnae is not female or male education; it is indeed quality of programs in the college and availability of projects in the future. So, female education no longer guarantees financial support from the alumnae.
To sum up, the author of this passage provides a series of fallacy prepositions at the Grove collage about coeducation and female-based education. To bolster this argument the author should provide more information about the gender of faculty members and alumnae members. He also should provide more information about the opinion of male students about the Grove collage, its offered programs and quality of programs.
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 2.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 22 15
No. of Words: 408 350
No. of Characters: 2057 1500
No. of Different Words: 157 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.494 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.042 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.53 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 171 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 128 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 73 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 36 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 18.545 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.451 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.455 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.384 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.568 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.174 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 255, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...d wants the student remains all female. The author wants that Grove college only ad...
^^^
Line 7, column 546, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...age the alumnae to support the college. The author assumption based on a doubtful p...
^^^
Line 7, column 601, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...mption based on a doubtful proposition. The author overlooks that what encourages t...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, look, regarding, second, secondly, so, third, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.6327345309 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.9520958084 23% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 11.1786427146 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 13.6137724551 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 28.8173652695 73% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 55.5748502994 110% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 16.3942115768 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2109.0 2260.96107784 93% => OK
No of words: 408.0 441.139720559 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16911764706 5.12650576532 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49433085973 4.56307096286 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59788082203 2.78398813304 93% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 204.123752495 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.404411764706 0.468620217663 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 678.6 705.55239521 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.96107784431 81% => OK
Article: 17.0 8.76447105788 194% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.70958083832 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 19.7664670659 111% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.8473053892 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.5754305449 57.8364921388 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.8636363636 119.503703932 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5454545455 23.324526521 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.72727272727 5.70786347227 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.25449101796 57% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.20758483034 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 6.88822355289 73% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.67664670659 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290450068817 0.218282227539 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102046520137 0.0743258471296 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0754425411141 0.0701772020484 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193921499385 0.128457276422 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0747369579509 0.0628817314937 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 14.3799401198 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 48.3550499002 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.197005988 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.5979740519 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.32208582834 97% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 98.500998004 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 12.3882235529 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.1389221557 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.