By and large, there are certain considerations or factors which everyone can take into account to investigate and examine the test ways of an argument. The writer is of the view that the capability the argument to convince someone with an opposing opinion is the best way to examine assertion. Because the only approach to explore the value of the idea is advocated that against conflicting angles. As far as I am concerned, I cannot agree with the claim as it is and I cannot with the reason either since both the claim and the reason are problematic. However, careful scrutiny of the evidence reveals that it provides little credible support for our conclusion.
The first salient aspect to be introduced is that the author states in the claim statement “the best test of an argument”, which don’t nominate any evidence to support its mentioned statement. I think exist another exhausted way to test an argument which may persuade detractors such as gain the person trust, Back up reasoning with vivid examples and evidence and so on.
Another equally noteworthy point corroborating my stance is that the author implies that the only way to found out the value of the idea is defending that against opposing viewpoints. I strongly believe that each idea gets value in a different situation. Educational systems are the one example of rejecting this reason. I think that scientists are propounding several ideas for developing educational systems in each country every year, but these ideas may don’t have any exhausted modification in other countries, even if defend that against opposing viewpoints. Therefore, the value of ideas varies from place to place.
With respect to the reason, as mentioned in the introductive paragraph. I cannot agree with it because I think with compulsion nothing becomes worthwhile. I extremely believe that when ideas become valuable which all the doubter and detractors accept the idea without any force. There are many examples to prove this manner in many of the countries which have a dictatorship government.
From what was already mentioned, considering the aforementioned points, I firmly believe that there are more rational claims and reasons to evaluate the test ways of an argument. As a matter of fact, some other reasons can be invoked to back up my perspective, but let us suffice to this.
- TPO-15 - Integrated Writing Task The cane toad is a large (1.8 kg) amphibian species native to Central and South America. It was deliberately introduced to Australia in 1935 with the expectation that it would protect farmers' crops by eating harmful insec 60
- At some schools some lessons for young students ages 5 8 include video games as a way to increase students interest in learning Some people believe this is a very effective way for young students to learn while others believe it is too distracting and was 90
- Imagine that you are planning to take a vacation, trying to decide between two places to visit. Which of these two options do you believe would give you better information about making your choice? Why?-- Reading about the places online--Discussing the pl 60
- TPO-24 - Integrated Writing Task Animal fossils usually provide very little opportunity to study the actual animal tissues, because in fossils the animals' living tissues have been largely replaced by minerals. Thus, scientists were very excited recently 73
- TPO-23 - Integrated Writing Task Populations of the yellow cedar, a species of tree that is common in northwestern North America, have been steadily declining for more than a century now, since about 1880. Scientists have advanced several hypotheses expla 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 295, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...n is the best way to examine assertion. Because the only approach to explore the value ...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, so, therefore, while, as for, i think, such as, as a matter of fact, by and large, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1976.0 2235.4752809 88% => OK
No of words: 387.0 442.535393258 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10594315245 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43534841618 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86482095193 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 215.323595506 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.519379844961 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 636.3 704.065955056 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.3845290987 60.3974514979 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.777777778 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 23.4991977007 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.11111111111 5.21951772744 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.385124762673 0.243740707755 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105898859823 0.0831039109588 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0633562496252 0.0758088955206 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193373453221 0.150359130593 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0690673114693 0.0667264976115 104% => OK
automated_readability_index: 13.4 14.1392134831 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 100.480337079 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Rates: 79.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.75 Out of 6
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.