Claim: The best way to understand the character of a society is to examine the character of the men and women that the society chooses as its heroes or its role models.
Reason: Heroes and role models reveal a society's highest ideals.
The author is making a claim that character of a society should be judged on the basis of heroes and role models it has chosen. In making this claim author is overlooking several possible scenarios wherein heroes and role models may not accurately portray the character or ideals of the society.
Firstly, there can be scenario in which one becomes a hero not because of some high values but due to special abilities or exceptional talents. Such heroes can only show off their innate talents, and the society at large may also remain indifferent to the ideals of such heroes. Consider Mark Zuckerberg of Facebook, who is a role model for many people all over the world. Zuckerberg is the founder of Facebook, but is actually accused of stealing the idea of Facebook from winkle Voss brothers. His company Facebook is often accused of overtaking smaller companies and utilizing them for its own use. But still he is seen as a role model, because people value his ideas, his vision not much his principles.
Secondly, society does not comprise of few individuals only, but of various groups. Nowadays the societies can be very large and diverse, uniformity in a society is very rare. These groups can have different opinions that may be independent also. It is possible that not every section of the society is represented by them. Like in USA which is a country of immigrants, there is appreciable population of Indians settled there. So Indians who have settled in USA may not associate themselves with the role models of American Society. So in diverse societies values among the common masses can vary, and role models may actually not be able to subsume all of these values.
However it is not to say that Heroes and Role models can never portray the true values of a society. Heroes and Role models are people who have come from the society itself. Among hoards of people they are the ones who have overcome their fears, weaknesses, and failures, and in doing so have developed a highly strong character.
To conclude I must say that to judge a society based on the character of its heroes and role models is actually misleading, in a way that heroes are often not formed based on their character but based on their talent, and their can values and principles may not appeal to every section of the society. Thus giving oneself a fallacious view of the character of society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 297, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the character or ideals of the society. Firstly, there can be scenario in which ...
^^^
Line 3, column 28, Rule ID: COMPRISE_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comprise' or 'consist of'?
Suggestion: comprise; consist of
...principles. Secondly, society does not comprise of few individuals only, but of various gr...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 241, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...ferent opinions that may be independent also. It is possible that not every section ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...e able to subsume all of these values. However it is not to say that Heroes and Role m...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 369, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cious view of the character of society.
^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['actually', 'also', 'but', 'first', 'firstly', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'may', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'still', 'thus']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.248888888889 0.240241500013 104% => OK
Verbs: 0.151111111111 0.157235817809 96% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0711111111111 0.0880659088768 81% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0711111111111 0.0497285424764 143% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0488888888889 0.0444667217837 110% => OK
Prepositions: 0.12 0.12292977631 98% => OK
Participles: 0.0511111111111 0.0406280797675 126% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.51387547125 2.79330140395 90% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0155555555556 0.030933414821 50% => OK
Particles: 0.00222222222222 0.0016655270985 133% => OK
Determiners: 0.0866666666667 0.0997080785238 87% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0333333333333 0.0249443105267 134% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0155555555556 0.0148568991511 105% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2384.0 2732.02544248 87% => OK
No of words: 414.0 452.878318584 91% => OK
Chars per words: 5.75845410628 6.0361032391 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51076378781 4.58838876751 98% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.364734299517 0.366273622748 100% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.248792270531 0.280924506359 89% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.157004830918 0.200843997647 78% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0966183574879 0.132149295362 73% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51387547125 2.79330140395 90% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 219.290929204 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.468599033816 0.48968727796 96% => OK
Word variations: 50.8567281451 55.4138127331 92% => OK
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6194690265 97% => OK
Sentence length: 20.7 23.380412469 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.3591848623 59.4972553346 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.2 141.124799967 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7 23.380412469 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.7 0.674092028746 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.21349557522 96% => OK
Readability: 45.5792270531 51.4728631049 89% => OK
Elegance: 1.54918032787 1.64882698954 94% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.566856431264 0.391690518653 145% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.162901154505 0.123202303941 132% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0978032106347 0.077325440228 126% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.537921130076 0.547984918172 98% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.170146059619 0.149214159877 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.227817077992 0.161403998019 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.137447404609 0.0892212321368 154% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.384290513563 0.385218514788 100% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0353428863832 0.0692045440612 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.420094907026 0.275328986314 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0876983249511 0.0653680567796 134% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.4325221239 105% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.30420353982 57% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88274336283 123% => OK
Positive topic words: 8.0 7.22455752212 111% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 3.66592920354 27% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 6.0 2.70907079646 221% => OK
Total topic words: 15.0 13.5995575221 110% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.