Claim: The best way to understand the character of a society is to examine the character of the men and women that the society chooses as its heroes or its role models.
Reason: Heroes and role models reveal a society's highest ideals.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
Finding characteristics of society has always been an important issue for sociologists and government for understanding the society in deep and making correct decisions. While understanding the characteristic of heroes of the society could provide a good insight into the population, nonetheless, I could not accept the claim as it is and I explain my view now.
Understanding the specification of the ideal person may provide a perspective view of the belief of the individuals but in fact, it might not be the best way. Because people in society have different ideas about life so they could have different role models with various specifications. Therefore, there is not just a role model for the whole of society. On the other hand, some believe heroes are just appropriate for a special skill. Take a sportsman as an example, he might not be a role model for family life and he could have several defects in private life.
The reason which is provided is not persuasive. Since nowadays people have more broaden view in comparison with the last decades. Most of them do not believe any role model or hero and they think it is ridiculous and far from the logic of the world. Thus, some individuals do not have any role models even in their minds and may just follow some instructions of successful persons for a specific purpose.
Finally, the method which is explained in the claim could have some merits and could provide a perfunctory view of the society but it could not be the best way for this purpose. These days numerous scientific methods can be held to find out the characters of the society. For example, experts provide questionnaires to get a view of people in marriage.
In conclusion, although the claim could provide a beneficial method to find a view of the society's character, nevertheless it could not be the best way and some scientific methods could prepare a comprehensive view of the society.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 48, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...on which is provided is not persuasive. Since nowadays people have more broaden view ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, if, may, nevertheless, nonetheless, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, in fact, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 11.3162921348 18% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 33.0505617978 48% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 58.6224719101 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1595.0 2235.4752809 71% => OK
No of words: 328.0 442.535393258 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86280487805 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9386179635 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 215.323595506 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.478658536585 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 704.065955056 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.6039085008 60.3974514979 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.333333333 118.986275619 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8666666667 23.4991977007 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.6 5.21951772744 184% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226848342843 0.243740707755 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0802741020645 0.0831039109588 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0450111344003 0.0758088955206 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132772076177 0.150359130593 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0431618430431 0.0667264976115 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 100.480337079 65% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 48, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...on which is provided is not persuasive. Since nowadays people have more broaden view ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, if, may, nevertheless, nonetheless, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, in fact, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 11.3162921348 18% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 33.0505617978 48% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 58.6224719101 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1595.0 2235.4752809 71% => OK
No of words: 328.0 442.535393258 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86280487805 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9386179635 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 215.323595506 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.478658536585 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 704.065955056 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.6039085008 60.3974514979 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.333333333 118.986275619 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8666666667 23.4991977007 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.6 5.21951772744 184% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226848342843 0.243740707755 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0802741020645 0.0831039109588 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0450111344003 0.0758088955206 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132772076177 0.150359130593 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0431618430431 0.0667264976115 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 100.480337079 65% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.