“The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.”
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
The statements is not true neccesarily and it is kind of "all or nothing" idea. I strongly agree with the first part but the second part should be investgated and survey in different situations.
As I was student for several years I could understand different behaviours of educators with students in order to whet students to work harder. They have special attention or praise top students to encourage other students to be similar them or try their best to evolve thier scores. These activities had always motivated us in the school period. On the other hand, some lazy students did not attract attention of teachers so they had to change thier behaviour to get promotion or prize.
However, the second part of the statement that is ignoring negative actions might have some misbehaving effect. For example, some actions that distract other student would be cosidered and instructor should try to eliminate these behviour because it could compeletely affect the process of learning and waste the class time or harm other students. For example, bulling activities should not be estimated as thrival actions and precluding to repeat is necessary opertion or a student that keep talking during the class should be punished because it can lead to not only misunderstanding the lesson for themselves but also could distract the others which are intending to listen and learn.
The statement should improved by some phrases and I suggest to change it to "The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones unless they do not disturb or distract the others". In addition, I believe these two part of the statement should use togther and it would be more cogent if we add an extra explanation. In fact, I believe, students should be aware of the effect of their behaviours and the educator should explain ther weak points. For example, teacher could find and explain their problems in math test and propose some solution to improve them or can describe the situation which would happen if the student follow this method fo learning.
At the end, I could not support the original statement completely and I reckon the second part should be modified to include all of the situations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 16, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[4]
Message: You should probably use: 'are'.
Suggestion: are
The statements is not true neccesarily and it is kind of ...
^^
Line 9, column 126, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...cond part should be modified to include all of the situations.
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, for example, i reckon, in addition, in fact, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 14.8657303371 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 58.6224719101 65% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1859.0 2235.4752809 83% => OK
No of words: 371.0 442.535393258 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01078167116 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38877662729 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69262119072 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 215.323595506 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.522911051213 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 567.0 704.065955056 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.2502896757 60.3974514979 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.785714286 118.986275619 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5 23.4991977007 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.14285714286 5.21951772744 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132794179397 0.243740707755 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0512170155072 0.0831039109588 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0653673522851 0.0758088955206 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0735349734142 0.150359130593 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0562036165186 0.0667264976115 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 14.1392134831 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 48.8420337079 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 100.480337079 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.