“The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.”
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and
supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
I would agree with the authors ideology of "the best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negetive ones." , however, only to an extent as it brings with itself a motley of emotions and assumptions.
Looking back into my early days, i vaguely remember my father letting me win the race between me and him and would publically praise me on our way back home. That indeed instilled in me a lot of confidence and a sense of victory working like dopamine, leaving me asking for more. That's exaclty what praising postive actions brings about in our lives. It's scientifically proven that praising an individual directly relates to an increased confidence and outlook of the being releasing chemicals making you feel elated and implicitly like the field.
Seeking praise is somehting we inherently long for, when combined with teaching it acts as a postive trigger. Relating our actions (good or bad) directly with the amount of praise our actions bring with them. The young picking swiftly picking up on these start to build on there strenghts i.e. that brings them more appreciation, boosting morale and inherently develop affinity towards their actions. Having said that, calling out a action as positive is very subjecttive and needs to be very sensitively handled. Since, it now resides upon the teachers to make sure the sense of positivity is instilled upon all the individual with no one left behind.
Having said that, we cannot solely reside on praising the good habits/actions and keep 'mum' on the negetive actions performed by an individual i.e 'Ignorance is bliss'. With the assumption that everything will fall in place automatically. Negetive actions if not corrected or thwarted on time lead to much bigger issue than instilling postive traits. Trust is only broken once and can never be repaired--To say that, it only takes one bad trait to bring down an individual down to dust. just ignoring the negetive actions rather portrays the tacit message that "it is not bad to do" and one would keep repeating the same mistakes over and over unless told and rectified. For instance, Kevin Spacey one of the best Hollywood actors we have ever seen was remonstrated for his negligence towards respecting women. Not corrected over time has lead to his downfall.
In conclusion, it is compelling to say that while teaching we should praise postive actions of the students but keeping in mind that their negetive actions do not slip with getting checked.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-12-26 | ali.rs | 58 | view |
2019-12-25 | ali.rs | 66 | view |
2019-12-25 | ali.rs | 66 | view |
2019-09-20 | Ramzah Rehman | 58 | view |
2018-12-02 | helpwithAWA | 79 | view |
- Understanding the past is of little use to those in current positions of leadership. 50
- Mass media and the internet have caused people’s attention spans to get shorter. However, the overall effect has been positive: while people are less able to focus on one thing, they more than make up for it with an enhanced ability to sort through lar 33
- Pirouettes Ballet School is the clear choice for any child. Of all the dance schools in Elmtown, Pirouettes has the most intensive program, and our teachers have danced in the most prestigious ballet companies all over the world. Many of our students have 33
- The well-being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority. 75
- The following appeared in a letter from the faculty committee to the president of Seatown University:A study conducted at nearby Oceania University showed that faculty retention is higher when professors are offered free tuition at the university for thei 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 24, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
I would agree with the authors ideology of 'the best way to teach...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 133, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... actions and ignore negetive ones.' , however, only to an extent as it brings...
^^
Line 3, column 281, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...e dopamine, leaving me asking for more. Thats exaclty what praising postive actions b...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 430, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... actions. Having said that, calling out a action as positive is very subjecttive ...
^
Line 5, column 513, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...d needs to be very sensitively handled. Since, it now resides upon the teachers to ma...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 485, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Just
... bring down an individual down to dust. just ignoring the negetive actions rather po...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, so, still, while, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 33.0505617978 139% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2087.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 414.0 442.535393258 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04106280193 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51076378781 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6688049684 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 238.0 215.323595506 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574879227053 0.4932671777 117% => OK
syllable_count: 649.8 704.065955056 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.2342534914 60.3974514979 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.944444444 118.986275619 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 23.4991977007 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.83333333333 5.21951772744 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232890198277 0.243740707755 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0661621910902 0.0831039109588 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0712240151113 0.0758088955206 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145713688348 0.150359130593 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0955711626821 0.0667264976115 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 100.480337079 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 79.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.