People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.
Can you imagine James bond running away from a nuclear explosion site to stay with the women he loves forgetting the millions of lives at stake; while spending the rest of his life explaining the logic behind it!
That does not sound a logical thing to do right.
Well that's exactly what would happen if we chose our emotions to drive our decision making ; It's human nature to cultivate an emotional bonding to make the experience more personal.
But, if we let it overshadow our dispassionate thinking we would be doomed.
With emotions we give importance to our immediate future and people close to us with no long term thought of sustainability or majority of the times the decision that might have a much greater impact.
This cultivate the seeds of 'bias' which reaps a high risk of sustenance since the decision has already been made and now all the work is done to sugar coat it with under cooked logical reasoning to present hold firm the idea.
People who driven by logic usually portray themselves as being cold hearted and being run only by numbers; lacking the the humane touch : but their decision making involves meticulous planning and juggernaut reasoning to support the argument.
Elon musk is an exemplar of logical decision making leaving behind the his selfish gains of profiting his own firm rather sharing the blueprints of the electric engine to bring about a positive change in the environment we live in as a whole.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-28 | AC1990 | 58 | view |
2020-01-19 | lcosenza | 54 | view |
2019-12-29 | mrigimunjal | 50 | view |
2019-12-25 | likhithae | 50 | view |
2019-12-22 | yashincontrol | 50 | view |
- Some people believe that government officials must carry out the will of the people they serve. Others believe that officials should base their decisions on their own judgment.Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your 50
- The following appeared in a letter from the faculty committee to the president of Seatown University:A study conducted at nearby Oceania University showed that faculty retention is higher when professors are offered free tuition at the university for thei 50
- Understanding the past is of little use to those in current positions of leadership. 50
- The following report appeared in the newsletter of the West Meria Public Health Council."An innovative treatment has come to our attention that promises to significantly reduce absenteeism in our schools and workplaces. A study reports that in nearby East 35
- Technology, while apparently aimed to simplify our lives, only makes our lives more complicated. 16
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 8, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Can you imagine James bond running away from a n...
^^
Line 5, column 6, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...nd a logical thing to do right. Well thats exactly what would happen if we chose o...
^^^^^
Line 14, column 76, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...portray themselves as being cold hearted and being run only by numbers; lacking t...
^^
Line 14, column 117, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
... and being run only by numbers; lacking the the humane touch : but their decision makin...
^^^^^^^
Line 14, column 117, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
... and being run only by numbers; lacking the the humane touch : but their decision makin...
^^^^^^^
Line 16, column 68, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'his'?
Suggestion: the; his
... logical decision making leaving behind the his selfish gains of profiting his own firm...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 19.5258426966 31% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 58.6224719101 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1212.0 2235.4752809 54% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 248.0 442.535393258 56% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88709677419 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 4.55969084622 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51674710688 2.79657885939 90% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 215.323595506 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.685483870968 0.4932671777 139% => OK
syllable_count: 377.1 704.065955056 54% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 20.2370786517 35% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 35.0 23.0359550562 152% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.8841824158 60.3974514979 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 173.142857143 118.986275619 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.4285714286 23.4991977007 151% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.42857142857 5.21951772744 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 8.0 4.97078651685 161% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284322420816 0.243740707755 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120098489976 0.0831039109588 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0649018809465 0.0758088955206 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109165113635 0.150359130593 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.066966226883 0.0667264976115 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.3 14.1392134831 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.41 48.8420337079 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 12.1743820225 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 100.480337079 58% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.0 11.2143820225 143% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.7820224719 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.