Mass media and the internet have caused people’s attention spans to get shorter. However, the overall effect has been positive: while people are less able to focus on one thing, they more than make up for it with an enhanced ability to sort through large quantities of information and find what’s important.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Remember the video by CNN covering attacks on Syria right below the viral Kiki challenge video you posted.
With oncoming of the internet and exponential technological advancements : Machine Learning, Cognitive services, Artificial intelligence; has opened new doors towards understanding the human psychic.According to the latest study, researchers have confirmed have confirmed majority of Mass media consumers are constant lookout for something new,exciting, enthralling.
Alongside, a Harvard study that confirms that a human brain can only store up-to 4 disparate things in our temporary memory and if this information unless badgered onto us over and over again gets lost in transit with new information.
We, the consumers of today's -- Profounded by unfiltered content over Internet/Mass Media are well informed--not well understood--There isn't any fact finding or in depth knowledge of the subjects.
This well informed knowledge is just stored in our temporary memory of the brain and is immediately easily overshadowed by another "well informed" set of information and the vicious circle continues.
Although, it is not fair to say we homospaiens haven't been able to comprehend the dupious nature of Mass media-- homeostasis--ability to enhance our understanding of the subject and bolster our understanding of filtering our important information just like a needle in a haystack.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 200, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: According
...towards understanding the human psychic.According to the latest study, researchers have c...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 243, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'have confirmed'.
Suggestion: have confirmed
...ording to the latest study, researchers have confirmed have confirmed majority of Mass media consumers are co...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 344, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , exciting
...s are constant lookout for something new,exciting, enthralling. Alongside, a Harvard stu...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 136, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...ll informed--not well understood--There isnt any fact finding or in depth knowledge ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 48, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: haven't
...h, it is not fair to say we homospaiens havent been able to comprehend the dupious nat...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, so, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 19.5258426966 31% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 12.4196629213 8% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 11.3162921348 18% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 33.0505617978 39% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 58.6224719101 55% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1204.0 2235.4752809 54% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 206.0 442.535393258 47% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.84466019417 5.05705443957 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 4.55969084622 83% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.55904340249 2.79657885939 127% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 215.323595506 66% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.68932038835 0.4932671777 140% => OK
syllable_count: 374.4 704.065955056 53% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 20.2370786517 30% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 23.0359550562 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 79.6213260098 60.3974514979 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 200.666666667 118.986275619 169% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.3333333333 23.4991977007 146% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.21951772744 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124538091378 0.243740707755 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0547192084144 0.0831039109588 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0323496553703 0.0758088955206 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0547192084144 0.150359130593 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0323496553703 0.0667264976115 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 23.2 14.1392134831 164% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 20.05 48.8420337079 41% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 7.92365168539 184% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.9 12.1743820225 155% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.18 12.1639044944 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.3 8.38706741573 135% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 100.480337079 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 20.5 11.8971910112 172% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 11.2143820225 139% => OK
text_standard: 21.0 11.7820224719 178% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.