Understanding the past is of little use to those in current positions of leadership.
researching and reading about the race circuit in mind of a nascar racer before a race always holds good in compaison to a racer that directly jumps on the car on the day for the race; Understaning the past does play a major role for people in positions of leadership in current settting.
There is a reason why we usually denote the elderly in our family as 'wise' or 'sage' and are supopsed to give us right consults. That's precisely because they have come of age with experience, seeing what was right and what went wrong while working in a particular fashion. Similary, people in current postions of leaderships are seen by demotic as sage's who will lead us in the right direction-- of prospertiy and transquility.
Understanding and learning about the past of a society, helps the leader pick up on the natural virtues a society, where they come from, what they seek the most from there leaders. For example, If the Primer minister of India were to start picking up and implementing the plans being laid out by developed nation of devloping highways for car-pool vehicles without looking back into current status of the roads, we are doomed.
This does not undermines the fact that knowing about the past is all what it takes to become an efficient leader. Not always can they pick up on stratergies that had a significant impact two decades ago to assume that it will hold good today as well. For instance, Leaders professing laws only keeping into consideration settings of 1990's without giving any thoughts to the 'Age of the internet' and reforms curtailing issues pervailing in the online society, are bound have scarce popularity amongst the demographic.
In all fairness, for a leader to be efficient and work towards the betterment of a society understanding of the past is of cardinal importance.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Researching
researching and reading about the race circuit in m...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 127, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...are supopsed to give us right consults. Thats precisely because they have come of age...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 15, Rule ID: DOES_X_HAS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'undermine'? As 'do' is already inflected, the verb cannot also be inflected.
Suggestion: undermine
... roads, we are doomed. This does not undermines the fact that knowing about the past is...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 15, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'does' requires base form of the verb: 'undermine'
Suggestion: undermine
... roads, we are doomed. This does not undermines the fact that knowing about the past is...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, so, well, while, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.4196629213 24% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 33.0505617978 48% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1506.0 2235.4752809 67% => OK
No of words: 311.0 442.535393258 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8424437299 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72738570218 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 215.323595506 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.594855305466 0.4932671777 121% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 704.065955056 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 20.2370786517 49% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 23.0359550562 135% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.8338532939 60.3974514979 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.6 118.986275619 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.1 23.4991977007 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2 5.21951772744 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135163040936 0.243740707755 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0489724774217 0.0831039109588 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0475064634589 0.0758088955206 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0762706260602 0.150359130593 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0379790385673 0.0667264976115 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 14.1392134831 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.47 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.38706741573 111% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 100.480337079 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.8971910112 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 11.2143820225 128% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.