Understanding the past is of little use to those in current positions of leadership.
It is of paramount importance for an individual in position of power to understand the past and make appropriate decisions for the welfare of their group. Studying the past is always the best way to learn from one's mistake and develop impeccable solutions.
History has been the best source of information for humans. It has facilitated humankind to procure information about their ancestors, technology, science etc. It has been the point of reference for everyone trying to improve various aspects of life that was left behind by their ancestors. It would be incongruous to disregard such a pristine source of information.
Anyone in the position of power or leadership must have an abstract understanding of the past. Leaders are the most important individuals within a group as they have the responsibility to accept or repudiate an idea. Any person having such a responsibility must be well-versed about the consequences of accepting or refuting an idea.
A leader must be able to judge whether an idea will be a success and its feasibility. A person can procure such an ability only when he/she has a modicum of knowledge about the past. For example, it is pivotal for a political party leader to have adequate knowledge and experience to spearhead a political party.
Politics has always been a different ball game and the leader of a party must have an unique persona to be successful. The ability to delve on one's experience and past knowledge to bail out their part from a cataclysmic situation differentiates a party leader from a follower. Likewise, knowledge about the past is quintessential in myriad domains such as sports, education. Having a good understanding of the past is not the only factor that ensures success. The success of a group is ensured when past knowledge is reinforced with good judgment and pragmatism.
Hence, the past knowledge is one of the important factors that contributes towards the success of a group and it is quintessential for the people in position of leadership to hav
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 211, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...st is always the best way to learn from ones mistake and develop impeccable solution...
^^^^
Line 9, column 235, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... or repudiate an idea. Any person having such a responsibility must be well-verse...
^^
Line 13, column 133, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on can procure such an ability only when he/she has a modicum of knowledge about ...
^^
Line 17, column 84, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ame and the leader of a party must have an unique persona to be successful. The ab...
^^
Line 17, column 382, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...omains such as sports, education. Having a good understanding of the past is not ...
^^
Line 17, column 500, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
.... The success of a group is ensured when past knowledge is reinforced with good j...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, likewise, so, well, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 33.0505617978 51% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1707.0 2235.4752809 76% => OK
No of words: 336.0 442.535393258 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08035714286 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07784576714 2.79657885939 110% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 215.323595506 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.47619047619 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 544.5 704.065955056 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.5004184946 60.3974514979 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 94.8333333333 118.986275619 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 23.4991977007 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.11111111111 5.21951772744 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143600468576 0.243740707755 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0556442155147 0.0831039109588 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0781025842763 0.0758088955206 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0903871136878 0.150359130593 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0584321911258 0.0667264976115 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 100.480337079 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.