Discussing controversial topics with those with contrasting views is not useful because very few people change their mind when questioned about their core beliefs.
The discussion between two individuals with contrasting ideas on an inflammatory topic is superfluous as it often evokes a negative reaction from the participants when their innate beliefs are questioned.
Discussion among people is often done to exchange ideas and get to know one's perspective on some issues. Discussions must be healthy i.e all the involved parties must be able to convey their ideas or opinions without being derisive or vociferous. The ideas flow coherently between people if they are in a mindset to accept it and when the discussions are healthy.
While discussing inflammatory topics, there is a high likelihood of betraying or offending someone's beliefs and sentiments. For instance, the discussion about religion is often controversial. Religion is one of the aspects of a society people associate themselves with.
Topics involving religion are highly sensitive and inappropriate for public debate as it engenders division among people. As people associate themselves with religion, when their religious beliefs are discussed and contradicting viewpoints are proposed, they tend to think that their core beliefs and morals have been questioned and that will lead to tumultuous scenes in the country.
For example, when an atheist discusses with a Hindu about the existence of Lord Shiva, the discussion will cease to be healthy and the Hindu is more likely to get agitated and take things personally. It will be followed by a flurry of insults towards the atheist and a fist-fight between the individuals. Even though discussion of controversial topics more often leads to an argument, it is infelicitous to stay mum on controversial issues that are plaguing the progress of a country. Such issues must be discussed with care to develop a feasible solution that is seconded by all the participants.
Hence, the discussion of inflammatory topics between participants with contrasting beliefs does not result in a healthy discussion but in argument due to the inability of either participant to accept their core beliefs being questioned.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 73, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
... done to exchange ideas and get to know ones perspective on some issues. Discussions...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, second, so, while, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 33.0505617978 57% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 58.6224719101 80% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1765.0 2235.4752809 79% => OK
No of words: 324.0 442.535393258 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4475308642 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09728181246 2.79657885939 111% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 215.323595506 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.509259259259 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 547.2 704.065955056 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.6832041483 60.3974514979 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.071428571 118.986275619 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1428571429 23.4991977007 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.28571428571 5.21951772744 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 10.2758426966 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.295058690927 0.243740707755 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103335634088 0.0831039109588 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0687490608789 0.0758088955206 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168821764387 0.150359130593 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0409899651389 0.0667264976115 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 14.1392134831 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 48.8420337079 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 12.1639044944 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.38706741573 112% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 100.480337079 95% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.