The well-being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority.
Questioning the one in power has been long known to play a very crucial role in contributing towards the well-being of the society.
To start with, raising questions acts as a pervasive feedback mechanism in the system, raising key topics in front the authorities in rule and the general public.
It helps the authorities construe the key concerns being faced in the soceity and diverting there attention to meet their needs.For example, in light of the recent #MeToo movement, has brought in front a long neglected issue of sexual harressment in our society.This caught attention by the authorities and the 'predators' have been lawfully charged despite there affluent status.
This is just one exmaple that sheds light towards the sheer strength of questioning the govt. in bringing about a positive change.
Moreover, authorities are governed on laws that are set by the people; for the people and in all fairness with the change in economic and social trends, the rules if not rightly questioned or updated serve there course only as a mere piece of paper with no effective value.With the onset of the so called 'social-activity' on the internet has brought with itself a plethora of challenges including; privacy, safety concerns while traversing over the internet and posting selfies over social media. It was only with the push by the people in masses that brought in light issues of data breach in one the biggest socail networking platform "Facebook".
Having said that, i at no point mean to say that the questions being raised needs to be blindly taken into consideration. Authorites needs to evalute the argument and weigh there options that helps the masses without neglecting the minorities.If authorites simply start implementing resources towards the issues being raised we as a society might walking towards cliff blind-folded.Not forgetting the case in Delhi,India where the Jatt community resorted to remonstrations and violance on the streets near the parliament to attain special quotos in the education and healthcare institutions exclusively for there group.
There has been many such instances where group's question the authorities for selfish reasons that do more harm than good for the society as a whole.
In a nutshell, questioning the authorities does contribute towards enhancing the society, however, we cannot neglect the due considerations and evalutions a change must go through that helps the masses and not just a clique.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 148, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...n front the authorities in rule and the general public. It helps the authorities construe the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 128, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: For
...ing there attention to meet their needs.For example, in light of the recent #MeToo ...
^^^
Line 4, column 262, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: This
...ue of sexual harressment in our society.This caught attention by the authorities and...
^^^^
Line 7, column 274, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: With
... piece of paper with no effective value.With the onset of the so called social-activ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 244, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: If
...asses without neglecting the minorities.If authorites simply start implementing re...
^^
Line 9, column 383, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Not
...ight walking towards cliff blind-folded.Not forgetting the case in Delhi,India wher...
^^^
Line 9, column 415, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , India
...-folded.Not forgetting the case in Delhi,India where the Jatt community resorted to re...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, so, well, while, for example, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.4196629213 24% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 58.6224719101 94% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2085.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 394.0 442.535393258 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29187817259 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45527027702 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00298000189 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571065989848 0.4932671777 116% => OK
syllable_count: 621.0 704.065955056 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.2370786517 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 35.0 23.0359550562 152% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 152.854222131 60.3974514979 253% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 189.545454545 118.986275619 159% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.8181818182 23.4991977007 152% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.45454545455 5.21951772744 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 8.0 4.97078651685 161% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165685667213 0.243740707755 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0627270559846 0.0831039109588 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0434939767924 0.0758088955206 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0728925415703 0.150359130593 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0392216456889 0.0667264976115 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.4 14.1392134831 151% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.95 48.8420337079 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.9 12.1743820225 139% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.1639044944 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.82 8.38706741573 117% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 100.480337079 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.8971910112 155% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.0 11.2143820225 143% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.7820224719 161% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.