People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.
One may be inclined to believe that the given argument is veracious on the face of it. It is a general notion that emotion is subjective, ephemeral and varies situationally. Therefore, it might not be a good idea to rely on emotions at all. Logic on the other hand pervades universally and is often objective and everyone can accept it. An "excellent" decision maker may be inclined towards relying on facts, figures and statistics.
THe logic is deeply flawed. On the other hand, it is important to note that one cannot take out emotion from how humans process things in general. Humans just can not be expected to be completely free from emotions. It is impractical to dream of a decision that based on a purely logical argument that hasn't been diluted with emotion. Subjectivity and emotions are what set humans apart. One works the best if their choice aligns well with what they are emotionally passionate about even if it defies logic. Most successful people in the world were often classified as completely nuts as their decisions, which were fuelled by their emotions, defied commonly accepted ideas of logic and reason. However, their ideas resulted in disrupting the world in unimaginable but often fruitful ways.
Logic, too, is not as objective as it is projected to be. Ideals vary from culture to culture and decade to decade. The lens with which one views the world is ever-changing and evolving and the accepted ideas of logic follow the same suit with it. Even relying on facts, figures and statistics maybe a wrong call if they are not used judiciously. Mark Twain once famously said, "There are lies, damned lies and statistics." Blindly following statistics may land one up in a bad situation often times. These should always be taken with a pinch of salt after thoroughly checking if they are representative enough of the situation one wants to apply them to.
Lastly, it is important to stress on the fact that decisions at their facevalue are usually neither good or bad. Their entirety is determined by what follows. This post processing of events that followed is used to justify or refute arguments that were given before the decision was taken. Deeming people as poor decision makers is a very blunt remark and the generalization is not a wise move. Things could've gone bad or well in either case as we will never find out how it would've been if we had taken "The Road not Taken" just like Robert Frost never did.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 303, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: hasn't
...based on a purely logical argument that hasnt been diluted with emotion. Subjectivity...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 106, Rule ID: NEITHER_NOR[1]
Message: Use 'nor' with neither.
Suggestion: nor
...heir facevalue are usually neither good or bad. Their entirety is determined by wh...
^^
Line 13, column 476, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: would've
...r case as we will never find out how it wouldve been if we had taken 'The Road not...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, lastly, may, so, therefore, well, in general, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 34.0 19.5258426966 174% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2064.0 2235.4752809 92% => OK
No of words: 422.0 442.535393258 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89099526066 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53239876712 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79314234652 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 215.323595506 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547393364929 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 664.2 704.065955056 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.6085650517 60.3974514979 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.0 118.986275619 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5833333333 23.4991977007 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.375 5.21951772744 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202162920769 0.243740707755 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0565006138138 0.0831039109588 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0646304440384 0.0758088955206 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119351587808 0.150359130593 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0465094193583 0.0667264976115 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 14.1392134831 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.