Claim: The emergence of the online "blogosphere" has significantly weakened the quality of political discourse in the United States.
Reason: When anyone can publish political opinions easily, standards for covering news and political topics will inevitably decline.
Write a response in which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
Expression of ones ideas and opinions is a fundamental right that an individual has and due to the emergence of the internet and various platforms, expressing one's views has become very easy. I believe that emergence of these blogspheres have not reduced the quality of debates or amount of political news coverage anywhere. It is so because, most of the sources are apocryphal and second that people don't believe everything on the internet.
To begin with, most of what we see on the internet are fabricated and false representations of the truth to blind the readers and tilt them towards and extreme opinion. Many of the acclaimed writer and bloggers twist the facts to become more recognizable and increase their outreach. For example recently an article was published on the prime minister of India stating that he ate non veg being a Hindu, which stirred a huge controversy all over the nation. But after further investigation it was found that it was a mere hoax. there are plethora of platforms that allow the common man to comment and express his mind and these are open for the world to see. This dos not mean that the person is an expert in the field of politics and his words are a carving on stone. Even though sometimes people do read these forums but most of the times its a skim through rather than a serious read about.
Secondly, In this advancing age, people do not believe what you say until you have solid proof about it. For example if a person reads about something baffling , he verifies the same through multiple sources and only then affirms his views. Thus the news about the government or the politicians may spread like forest fire but it only happens after the sources are verified and the people are convinced that the story being told are true and verified. Continuing the above example, the news which was published about Mr. Modi was debunked soon enough as the source of the information was doubt-able and also that people did not believe it to be true.
even though some of the views expressed on these blogs are worth reading and pondering upon. Their quality and depth really baffles the human mind, but the number of such writings are rare. Some people and do their due diligence before taking the route of the internet and provide people the correct points and also encourage them to lucidly think about what is happening around them the political sphere.
To conclude, however many of these blogs are being run and managed for good purposes like providing new and accurate information about the people who run their nation, most of them turn out to be dubious and cause more harm instead of doing any good. It should be on the reader to make sure not to get influenced by any extreme thought and make sure that the decorum required in political debates is maintained.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 15, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
Expression of ones ideas and opinions is a fundamental rig...
^^^^
Line 1, column 160, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ernet and various platforms, expressing ones views has become very easy. I believe t...
^^^^
Line 1, column 402, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...s are apocryphal and second that people dont believe everything on the internet. ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 529, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
...n it was found that it was a mere hoax. there are plethora of platforms that allow th...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 660, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: These
...nd these are open for the world to see. This dos not mean that the person is an expe...
^^^^
Line 3, column 842, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...read these forums but most of the times its a skim through rather than a serious re...
^^^
Line 5, column 160, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... a person reads about something baffling , he verifies the same through multiple s...
^^
Line 5, column 242, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ources and only then affirms his views. Thus the news about the government or the po...
^^^^
Line 5, column 572, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ebunked soon enough as the source of the information was doubt-able and also that...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Even
...eople did not believe it to be true. even though some of the views expressed on t...
^^^^
Line 7, column 13, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...t believe it to be true. even though some of the views expressed on these blogs are wort...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'really', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'then', 'thus', 'for example', 'to begin with']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.204980842912 0.240241500013 85% => OK
Verbs: 0.191570881226 0.157235817809 122% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0996168582375 0.0880659088768 113% => OK
Adverbs: 0.051724137931 0.0497285424764 104% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0478927203065 0.0444667217837 108% => OK
Prepositions: 0.126436781609 0.12292977631 103% => OK
Participles: 0.0536398467433 0.0406280797675 132% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.41425669266 2.79330140395 86% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0229885057471 0.030933414821 74% => OK
Particles: 0.00191570881226 0.0016655270985 115% => OK
Determiners: 0.116858237548 0.0997080785238 117% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00383141762452 0.0249443105267 15% => Some modal verbs wanted.
WH_determiners: 0.0134099616858 0.0148568991511 90% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2819.0 2732.02544248 103% => OK
No of words: 493.0 452.878318584 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.71805273834 6.0361032391 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71206996034 4.58838876751 103% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.306288032454 0.366273622748 84% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.231237322515 0.280924506359 82% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.139959432049 0.200843997647 70% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0933062880325 0.132149295362 71% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41425669266 2.79330140395 86% => OK
Unique words: 262.0 219.290929204 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531440162272 0.48968727796 109% => OK
Word variations: 63.8670271691 55.4138127331 115% => OK
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6194690265 92% => OK
Sentence length: 25.9473684211 23.380412469 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.8061644862 59.4972553346 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.368421053 141.124799967 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9473684211 23.380412469 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.684210526316 0.674092028746 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 5.21349557522 211% => Correct essay format wanted or double check grammar & spelling issues after essay writing.
Readability: 49.0711006726 51.4728631049 95% => OK
Elegance: 1.32236842105 1.64882698954 80% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.384628426465 0.391690518653 98% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.103808599238 0.123202303941 84% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0586490818212 0.077325440228 76% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.572043140103 0.547984918172 104% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.162813113622 0.149214159877 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.171173085472 0.161403998019 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0765805029715 0.0892212321368 86% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.462713959435 0.385218514788 120% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0651573680314 0.0692045440612 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.28411497919 0.275328986314 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.048806604617 0.0653680567796 75% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.4325221239 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.30420353982 57% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88274336283 82% => OK
Positive topic words: 9.0 7.22455752212 125% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 3.66592920354 27% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.70907079646 111% => OK
Total topic words: 13.0 13.5995575221 96% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.