This topic raises the controversial issue whether researchers should not limit their investigation to expect zone of their research that has an immediate and practical application because it is impossible to predict the outcomes with 100 percent certainty. Indisputably, the crucial role of research is to burgeon our living standards and it is based on meticulous plan and hard working. Therefore, I agree that it is impossible to predict all the outcomes even there are expected results from the research. Thus, to substantiate my case this essay will elaborate my reasons and examples clearly.
To begin with, the real evidence that we are living in dynamic world and the on-going research process holds all the up to date data that we are expect or we are not expect. On the one hand, all the research process indicates that there are some results the researchers cannot predict it and the cause beyond that is the interaction between the research variables. In deed, this interaction lead to unpredictable results. On striking examples is the world wide web, the researchers worked in local military network but the result was world wide net work and all of us get the benefit from it.
Further, the second vital point that should be taken into account that the unforeseen outcomes encourage researchers to invest more time to elaborate and analysis the result. In other words, the hidden results make researchers more eager to discover the recondite outcomes. This means researchers will widen their horizon in well rounded and unique knowledge.
Last but not least, limit the researchers investigation indicates narrow thinking process and they have to re-build their research skills effectively. Further, the outstanding researcher skills are using innovative ideas, critical thinking methods, cognitive flexibility and active communication skills to boost the research outcomes. Consequently, it is pretty obvious that there are unlimited benefits from the unexpected outcomes that could be prosper our world and lead to more advancements.
All in all, due to aforementioned reasons and examples, it is impossible to predict t all the research outcomes and the vivid facts are all the previous causes and example, and having the research skills is cardinal to bolster and challenging the research outcomes
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 78, Rule ID: ON-GOING[1]
Message: Did you mean 'ongoing'?
Suggestion: ongoing
... we are living in dynamic world and the on-going research process holds all the up to da...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 146, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'expected'.
Suggestion: expected
...lds all the up to date data that we are expect or we are not expect. On the one hand, ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 167, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'expected'.
Suggestion: expected
...e data that we are expect or we are not expect. On the one hand, all the research proc...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 535, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: worldwide
...cal military network but the result was world wide net work and all of us get the benefit ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 535, Rule ID: WORLD_WIDE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'worldwide'?
Suggestion: worldwide
...cal military network but the result was world wide net work and all of us get the benefit ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 31, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'researchers'' or 'researcher's'?
Suggestion: researchers'; researcher's
...ledge. Last but not least, limit the researchers investigation indicates narrow thinking...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, second, so, therefore, thus, well, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 58.6224719101 67% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1960.0 2235.4752809 88% => OK
No of words: 367.0 442.535393258 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34059945504 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88311191954 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 215.323595506 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.514986376022 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 599.4 704.065955056 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.3613884847 60.3974514979 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.666666667 118.986275619 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4666666667 23.4991977007 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.53333333333 5.21951772744 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258490810679 0.243740707755 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0895259149314 0.0831039109588 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0817863985193 0.0758088955206 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151751266194 0.150359130593 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0708570821603 0.0667264976115 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 14.1392134831 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.1639044944 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 100.480337079 95% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.