I prompt asserts that because it is impossible to determine an outcome of research with certitude, researcher should not limit their investigation to those province where the entity they discovered has to be of immediate and practical application. I agree with the claim that researcher should considered array of consideration as some research are of historic and intrinsic value and some discoveries are deemed valuable after the decade they are founded. However, we can predict the outcome of the research at the certain level.
Certain research conducted by physician and mathematics do have direct application in development of society. However, these researches are conducted worthwhile, and scientists are lauded for their discovery. For instance, a discovery of Black hole does not any immediate and relevant application, but is considered a pivotal finding in the area of physics studies.
Some discoveries are overlooked at their contemporary period, but future generation focuses on such discoveries, may harness the outcome of these researches for the further research activities, and can have practical application in modern society. For instance, Mendel law of genetics was overlooked at the time of discovery however, it has got eminence focus in the modern world.
Various professor and researcher, in their proposal, predict the outcome of the research. To satisfy their sponsor, the researcher, in which they are interested to conduct, will have the predicted outcome. They read various review articles to strengthen their outcome probability. Providing such tempting proposal, budgets are allocated to the researchers who are conducting research in topic like cancer, HIV-AIDS. However, conducted researches do not always have desired outcome.
Thus, researcher should not focus on the topic in those areas which have relevant and immediate application since the research can be based solely on theoretical purpose, and research outcome may have significant values after the decades of their discovery. The researches can predict the outcome of their research at certain degree based on their experience and knowledge.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 151, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this province' or 'those provinces'?
Suggestion: this province; those provinces
...should not limit their investigation to those province where the entity they discovered has to...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...inding in the area of physics studies. Some discoveries are overlooked at their...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, may, so, then, thus, while, as to, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1829.0 2235.4752809 82% => OK
No of words: 323.0 442.535393258 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.66253869969 5.05705443957 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99796887665 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 215.323595506 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.49226006192 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 580.5 704.065955056 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.5956310872 60.3974514979 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.933333333 118.986275619 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5333333333 23.4991977007 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.73333333333 5.21951772744 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.393280011029 0.243740707755 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146165511154 0.0831039109588 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.099824648708 0.0758088955206 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.229958486982 0.150359130593 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.119076834286 0.0667264976115 178% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 14.1392134831 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 48.8420337079 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 12.1639044944 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.38706741573 111% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 100.480337079 95% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.7820224719 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.