Claim: We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from those whose views contradict our own.
Reason: Disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with
Learning is a continuous process. We all are students our whole life. The only way we improve and make us a better person is based on the experiences we had in the past, what do we learn out of those experiences and how do we learn to adapt the ways others behave in the same situation. Each day in our life is a new lesson , its just that we need to have a proper outlook to analyse what we learnt in a day.
If a person wishes to learn then it should not be restricted as there is no limit to one’s learning. If a person has contradictory views then there is a chance that you might see a complete different side of that situation. Your point of view is completely opposite and you get to explore a lot new ways to deal with the same situation. This helps you to get exposed to a wider range of topics which you might have not even heard of or thought in your life. If a person has different view than yours then either to sit and contend on those views or to discuss new ideas, listening to the opponent and then concluding all depends on the learner. The mentality and broad mindedness of the learner play a key role here.
On contrary, with the person whom you share similar views, then both of you will agree on very easily and there will be no disagreement but this discussion will be bound by same set of thoughts with no new way of looking at the problem. I belive there is more of easy going agreement in this case rather than any learning. Take an example, you and your friend in same college, same social background having a similar lifestyle may have many views in common. When you discuss on certain issues then you will consider the same views and nothing new will come up in the discussion. As no new topic then the discussion becomes boring and you will end up with no innovative ,fruitful conclusions.
Having a quarrelling nature will never help in learning new things. If a person is dogmatic, and is firm on his/her believes, thoughts then there is no way to change the views of such a person. So whether your thoughts match or not , such people can never learn and they will be stuck in their own world.
So, learning is a process which is influenced by many factors like willingness, broadmindedness, person`s economic, social background. All these factors together are responsible and it has no connection with whether your thoughts/views match with the opponent or not.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 324, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...on. Each day in our life is a new lesson , its just that we need to have a proper ...
^^
Line 2, column 102, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...as there is no limit to one’s learning. If a person has contradictory views then t...
^^
Line 3, column 669, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...g and you will end up with no innovative ,fruitful conclusions. Having a quarre...
^^
Line 4, column 22, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ful conclusions. Having a quarrelling nature will never help in learning new ...
^^
Line 4, column 30, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lusions. Having a quarrelling nature will never help in learning new things. ...
^^
Line 4, column 235, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...n. So whether your thoughts match or not , such people can never learn and they wi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, may, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 43.0 33.0505617978 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1966.0 2235.4752809 88% => OK
No of words: 440.0 442.535393258 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.46818181818 5.05705443957 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57997565096 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60439769011 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 215.323595506 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.490909090909 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 599.4 704.065955056 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.6548084278 60.3974514979 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.3 118.986275619 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 23.4991977007 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.4 5.21951772744 27% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242563749661 0.243740707755 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0757454318306 0.0831039109588 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0336622647306 0.0758088955206 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131141821458 0.150359130593 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0317052235935 0.0667264976115 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 14.1392134831 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 48.8420337079 135% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.65 12.1639044944 71% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 100.480337079 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.