Claim: When planning courses, educators should take into account the interests and suggestions of their students.
Reason: Students are more motivated to learn when they are interested in what they are studying.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
The prompt urges for the educators to take suggestions from their students regarding planning their course structure and proclaimed the sole reason behind this is - that students are motivated to more to learn and grow in the subjects they are interested in. For some obvious reasons I would like to be "mostly agree" with the statement and hereby obliged to provide necessary elaboration of certain points in defense of my position.
To begin with - it is not a new thing to learn that people generally prefer to work on topics they have inclination to. Same goes for the students. A student having natural proclination towards a course or a subject will stand better chance to do good works compared to a normy who does not posses any of it. So, if the course makers and structurerers take suggestion from their students regarding their interests and profoundity while making their course plan, it would like to be more conducive to better learning of the students. For example - a bunch of students who do not have any foundness towards biological science, will not be motivated enough to learn if they are burdened with a ton of the relavent topics. It will be nothing but a mere taxing job for them; tending to finish as early as possible. As a result the possible learining outcome will also decrease. On the other hand, if the same students, having great interest in computer science and thus are provided with sufficient computing works or related works, they will be more motivated to bring good results and that will also reflect in their learnings. In the latter case they will learn far better and far enthusiastically.
Next thing to consider is that - if the sole purpose of the educators is to teach the students more profoundly so that they have great learning then only including the preferred courses in the curriculumn will not do the rest. Additively, the teachers need to make sure that they are delivering prime things discreetly and with great care to each individual one. Apart from providing great care, they educators also need to be efficient enough to make his or her class interesting. In many cases in academia - the cases are such that - students have chosen their preferred course and also the faculty is flexible enough to provide them with their chosen ones but the teacher who is delivering the lecture in the class are not motivated enough to conduct his or her class in an interesting manner. As a result, pupil becomes bored very easily even if they are studying their favourite subjects. So, it is also the case that - no matter how much profoundness one has in his or her respective subjects, the individual might not cultivate a great learning if he or she os devoid of a deft lecturer or a teacher.
Mentioning all these, it is also equally important for an institution to provide a student with all the necessary knowledge he or she needs to get to pave his or her way in the real world. It might not take any better conclusion if a student is taught only his or her favorite subjects althrough his student life as he will be respite of other information and knowledges of the world, pretty important to lead a good life. In that prospect, the educators should prepare their courses keeping in mind that - there is an excellent blend of various subjects in the platter of a student's workload so that he or she get the optimum chance to gain knowledge. For example - it might not be as much important for a EEE student to learn ethical course as his other core subjects are. However, any ethical or socialogical courses are quite important for hiim to go through as all of these will help him to be a better human being. Culturing of many virtues will build him for future. So, this is an important point the educators should take care of. Otherwise, the instituitions may not be able produce great learned human beings rather will be end up making human robots in place.
So, looking at all the points and critical remarks mentioned over the essay, it is encouraged to the teachers to prepare their courses also taking a note of the interests of the students to make it more interesting and enjoyable; however - the blending should be a balanced one so that the students will get optimum result in the long run.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 811, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...tending to finish as early as possible. As a result the possible learining outcome...
^^
Line 5, column 772, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an interesting manner" with adverb for "interesting"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ated enough to conduct his or her class in an interesting manner. As a result, pupil becomes bored very ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 576, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...of various subjects in the platter of a students workload so that he or she get the opti...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 612, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'gets'.
Suggestion: gets
...f a students workload so that he or she get the optimum chance to gain knowledge. F...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, may, regarding, so, then, thus, while, apart from, for example, as a result, in many cases, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 35.0 19.5258426966 179% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 24.0 12.4196629213 193% => OK
Conjunction : 27.0 14.8657303371 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 71.0 33.0505617978 215% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 91.0 58.6224719101 155% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3523.0 2235.4752809 158% => OK
No of words: 744.0 442.535393258 168% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73521505376 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.22267779917 4.55969084622 115% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64205528612 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 320.0 215.323595506 149% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.430107526882 0.4932671777 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1105.2 704.065955056 157% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 23.0359550562 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 80.4292938038 60.3974514979 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.5 118.986275619 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.6153846154 23.4991977007 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.92307692308 5.21951772744 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 20.0 10.2758426966 195% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271016554399 0.243740707755 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0849273144477 0.0831039109588 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0868286459492 0.0758088955206 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189345578539 0.150359130593 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0539114485314 0.0667264976115 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 14.1392134831 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 138.0 100.480337079 137% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 11.2143820225 118% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.